• kautau@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    That’s true, but also inversely generally being gross on a property does not outweigh the value of the property over time in most cases. Even having gross tenants over time at market rent generally results in net profit after they leave and any additional cleanup costs incurred, plus you still own the property at the end of the day, and if we’re talking about houses, you probably own the land too.

    I’ve seen what you’re describing and I think what you’re getting at is more of a societal systemic issue related to mental health and income. Most people I think would like to live clean and healthy lives, but they either need mental health support they aren’t getting/can’t afford, etc, and/or are spending more time working/taking care of family/battling addiction or whatever and end up not taking care of themselves or where they live

    But at the end of the day this is all anecdotal and the whole thing should be addressed by a governing body made up of compassionate voted-in representatives using available resources and a scientific approach that want to fix the problem rather than arbitrary individuals chatting about it

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Yeah that makes sense. I do wish the humans were more caring of each other. We’re all here together to live. Why not help each other?

    • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Are you trying to make a case that a gross tenant who doesn’t pay rent is the same as a nice tenant who does pay?