• [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      [X] Doubt

      Walking is what we evolved to do. While being a pedestrian in certain parts of cities is dangerous, tons of walking is done away from vehicles.

      • Multiplexer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        3 days ago

        Maybe depends on where you are living, but you quite probably have the wrong impression.

        In my country (Germany), less than 3000 people die each year in traffic overall, while already an estimated 4000 pedestrians die while simply using stairs.

        So, “Stairway to Heaven” gains a whole different layer of meaning, as it seems… :-)

        • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Goddamnit.

          Yet again, I have to say:

          “And people think Germans have no sense of humor.”

          … You got a chuckle out of me with that one, goddamnit, hahah!

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I would expect that pedestrian walk far less distance than cars drive, so even a twofold difference in absolute numbers will disappear when normalised by distance. For instance there is a general advice of walking 10k paces every day which is about 7km, average car speed in the city should be around 30km/h, so even if we assume 30 minutes of commute every day (and this is too generous, I believe) it will be more than two times the distance people (should) walk

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I don’t think people commonly refer to people using the stairs as being pedestrians.

      • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Parachuting/skydiving is incredibly low risk compared to the average person’s perception. The us had 9 deaths last year in 3.8 million skydives.

        Wing suit usage has a similar number, IF you don’t include base jumpers, which you shouldn’t, because it’s fundamentally a very, very different sport that happens to use (almost) the same equipment. You wouldn’t include each bump in a nascar race as an accident and lump it into driving statistics, I would hope, nor do the same for people hiking in the woods and people fist fighting bears in the woods.

        Considering I travel a mile or two, give or take, on each canopy flight when I jump, that’s 9 deaths in ~8 million miles. Wing suits have a much better glide ratio when flying, so that would change things up as well. I’m curious how that would hold up to walking. Using the other feller’s number of 4000 pedestrian deaths (on stairs) in germany, and estimating they walk 3 miles a day in a country of ~83 million, that’s 249 million miles, giving us 1.6x10^-5, while skydiving is 2.4x10^-6.

        But really… who would consider those activities as a mode of transport anyway?