• Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    And as usual everyone is saying NAS, but talking about servers with a built in NAS.

    I’m not saying you can’t run your services on the same machine as your NAS, I’m just confused why every time there’s a conversation about NASs it’s always about what software it can run.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The way I see it, a box of drives still needs something to connect it to your network.

      And that something that can only do a basic connection costs only a little less than something that can run a bunch of other stuff too.

      You can see why it all gets bundled together.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        For me it’s not about what else I can run on it. I want my services separated from my storage devices. If I throw everything into one physical machine it takes everything down if something goes wrong. It’s also harder to do upgrades without needing to replace entire machines

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      At this point you’re just fighting semantics. Even a commercial NAS is reliant on the software too, like with Synology. They run the disk management but also can run Docker and VMs with their built-in hypervisor.

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        If we lose the meaning of the word NAS then we can’t effectively talk about it. And enough new people are coming in and being taught that a NAS is the thing that runs Plex that it’s sometimes impossible to have a conductive conversation.