Bell Labs 'Unix' Tape from 1974 Successfully Dumped to a Tarball - Slashdot
tech.slashdot.org
Archive.org now has a page with "the raw analog waveform and the reconstructed digital tape image (analog.tap), read at the Computer History Museum's Shustek Research Archives on 19 December 2025 by Al Kossow using a modified tape reader and analyzed with Len Shustek's readtape tool." A Berlin-based...
View all comments ➔
        • bstix@feddit.dkEnglish
          3 months

          They also used the classic they knew what they were doing shortcut.

    • xthexder@l.sw0.comEnglish
      3 months

      Hello World in 1974: echo.c

      main(argc, argv)
int argc;
char *argv[];
{
	int i;

	argc--;
	for(i=1; i<=argc; i++)
		printf("%s%c", argv[i], i==argc? '\n': ' ');
}
        • xthexder@l.sw0.comEnglish
          3 months

          I think it’s actually quite elegant. No matter what it has to skip over argument 0 which will be the executable name echo.
          If the subtraction was removed and the loop changed to <, it would then need to do an addition or subtraction inside the loop to check if it’s the last argument.

          • palordrolap@fedia.io
            3 months

            The real question might be whether the compiler was smart enough to change var++ and var-- into ++var and --var when the initial values aren’t needed.

            As compiler optimisations go, it’s a fairly obvious one, but it was 1974 and putting checks like that in the compiler would increase its size and slow it down when both space and time were at a premium.