After the controversial news shared earlier this week by Mozilla’s new CEO that Firefox will evolve into “a modern AI browser,” the company now revealed it is working on an AI kill switch for the open-source web browser.

On Tuesday, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation, the company behind the beloved Firefox web browser used by almost all GNU/Linux distributions as the default browser.

In his message as new CEO, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo stated that Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software while remaining the company’s anchor, and that Firefox will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

What was not made clear is that Firefox will also ship with an AI kill switch that will let users completely disable all the AI features that are included in Firefox. Mozilla shared this important update earlier today to make it clear to everyone that Firefox will still be a trusted web browser.

  • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    They could do a survey amongst Firefox users about what they want.

    But if the result is anti-AI they can’t claim anymore that they weren’t aware of their users opinions.

    • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The issue is that there aren’t many of us Firefox users left, so asking us while FF wants to get NEW users to expand the market share (which is badly needed, so they do not lose their seat at the table regarding web standards, and to make them less dependent on googles payments) is not helpful at all.

      As long as i can switch it off with one click, i couldn’t care less and will continue using FF, but as you can see many existing users will bitch and moan even if it’s just one click.

      • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        so asking us while FF wants to get NEW users

        This is a balancing act and Mozilla behaves like an elefant in a porcelain shop right now. Worst case they loose their current users without attracting new ones.

        existing users will bitch and moan even if it’s just one click

        I’m one of them. Why not make it one click for people who want it instead?

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Worst case they loose their current users without attracting new ones.

          And where to?

          Ladybird, Servo and Floorp are all not useable as a daily driver and will take years to get there (and btw, the ladybird guy is a major shithead and last i heard of Servo was that they were going to cater to the embedded market, not a full blown browser).

          Firefox forks can do what they want, even switch off the AI button, but i’d still say they help keeping the browser engine itself afloat, because they still depend on Firefox - there’s not one fork with enough dev staff to keep up. That leaves us with chromium based browsers and safari. I’d say the commitment to the current userbase to make the changes optional is good enough to keep most of them.

          I ’m one of them. Why not make it one click for people who want it instead?

          I’d put current Firefox users much more in the department of “able to find the settings” than the vast majority of users. The majority wants something that works with everything they throw at it out of the box without rummaging through settings.

          • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            And where to?

            If both noteworthy browser engines are made by companies who make decisions against their user’s interest I might as well switch to the one with higher development budget.

            The majority wants something that works with everything they throw at it out of the box without rummaging through settings.

            And where does AI come into play here? It’s not like a browser without AI doesn’t work.

            • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              At least Firefox isn’t an extension of the worlds largest ad company, no amount of dev budget can fix that.

              Context aware search, summarizing in side view or importing an agent directly from a repository into your browser are things that come to mind without much thinking, and i am not a developer.

              • Dekkia@this.doesnotcut.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 hour ago

                Context aware search, summarizing in side view or importing an agent directly from a repository into your browser are things that come to mind without much thinking, and i am not a developer.

                And this is something normal users require?

            • mirshafie@europe.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Chill out. It’s literally just a sidebar for your LLM of choice.

              Don’t like it? Don’t use it.

              Don’t want it to clutter up your context menu? The same menu contains the option to disable it. Boom! Problem solved.

              Gonna use Chromium-based with no µBlock because your feelings got hurt? Have fun.