I told you…

We need dataset 9…

Have a scraper running on web.archive.org pulling all previously posted Court-Records and FOIA (docs,audio,etc.) from Jan 30th

Does anyone have the OTHER data sets from before? Ive been lasered in on the DS1-DS12 but havent looked at the other documents at all

this is ridiculous. Good thing we got in when we did!

All the zip files are gone on the DOJ website. The links are gone.

GFD….

My 2 cents. As a father of only daughters…

If we don’t weed out this sick behavior as a society we never will.

My thoughts are enough is enough.

Once the files are gone there is little to 0 chance they are ever public again….

You expect me to believe that a “oh shit we messed up” was accident?

It’s the perfect excuse… so no one looks at the files.

That’s my 2 cents.

I have been seeding all of the datasets since Sunday. The copy of set 9 has been the busiest, with set 10 a distant second. I plan on seeding them for quite a while yet, and also picking up a consolidated torrent when that becomes available. Hopefully you are able to get connected via the Swarm.

I’m getting errors for 1 and 8, all the rest went smooth.

read the OP re. DS9 and DS10

Hasn’t moved AFAIK, just going slowly.

It’s still here. No one dropped a complete dataset 9 yet tho…

can you explain to me what is the problem exact ? its the dataset9 ? when i press the dataset9 link of the DOJ gov i see a download start with 180gb zip file in the browser. ?

I’m not sure of the exact files that were reported by the NYT, but there certainly were some concerning images in the initial Jan 30 release, however it was certainly more than the reported 40. I saw others as well but I don’t remember what the file numbers we’re.

spoiler

[246249_247010]

From my own observation timeline on the images in question: Jan 30: Images were accessible through DOJ directly. File numbers wereskipped in the list, but were manually reachable through URL. All these photos were fully unredacted (uncensored). **Feb 1: ** Images were NOT accessible through DOJ anymore, returns “Page not found”. However images were (and still are) snapshotted via web.archive.org. Feb 2: Downloading the 87GB Set 9 appeared contain these images as well, meaning we likely all have them on our computers. yikes

These files were scrubbed from the DOJ website, along with many others.

I found many of the scrubbed files by parsing through the lists and finding large gaps in file numbers, where the preceding file did not contain multiple images/documents in one pdf. There are also tons of internal memos in the dataset that precede file groups and talk about the content ahead. These memos surrounded files that seemed like they were meant to be redacted, so its worth poking around. I didn’t go nuts, but things I found around these that interesting and were also removed:

• [EFTA00276493]: internal memo referring to Clinton photographed with “nude Gretchen”.
• [EFTA00273790-EFTA276487]: (removed) looks like arial Lidar scans of the full estate?
• [EFTA00276220]: (removed) panoramic Infrared / xray-ray scan of a room

I’m still waiting for just the first zip file to uncompress and it’s been HOURS. The ONLY reasonable explanation to bolster the NYT claim is that they put “AI” on the datasets running on a supercomputer, and “caught” the DOJ distributing CP! Show us the proof NYT! (redact faces and genitalia and show the images!) Then: CONVICT THEM ALL! LIFE IN PRISON FOR THE ENTIRE DOJ!!! ;-P

We didn’t have trouble getting Datasets 10, 11, or 12. I think Dataset 9 was probably delivered fine on Friday, so the NYTimes was able to grab a complete copy. Then, NYTimes started reporting the abusive material, which prompted the DOJ to yoink the ZIP, and it’s been screwy ever since.

I saw a post from a random Redditor confirming that they found abusive material, if that’s the concern. I doubt that the reports are fabricated, but I also agree that the reports are a great excuse for the DOJ to remove legitimate files.

if what you’re saying is that CSAM seems like a very good excuse to redact a lot more of those files than they previously intended, I agree yes.

DOJ Epstein Files: I found what’s around those 3 missing files (Part 2)

Follow-up to my Dataset 9 indexing post. I pulled the adjacent files from my local copy of the torrent. What I found is… notable.

---

TLDR

The 3 missing files aren’t random corruption. They all cluster around one event: Epstein’s girlfriend Karyna Shuliak leaving St. Thomas (the island) in April 2016. And one of the gaps sits directly next to an email where Epstein recommends her a novel about a sympathetic pedophile—two days before the book was publicly released.

---

The Big Finding: Duplicate Processing Batches

Two of the missing files (326497 and 534391) are the same document processed twice—once with redactions, once without—208,000 files apart in the index.

Redacted Batch	Unredacted Batch	Content
326494-326496	534388-534390	AmEx travel booking, staff emails
326497 - MISSING	534391 - MISSING	???
326498-326500	—	Email chain continues
326501 - MISSING	—	???
326502-326506	—	Reply + Invoice
—	534392	Epstein personal email

Random file corruption hitting the same logical document in two separate processing runs, 208,000 positions apart? That’s not how corruption works. That’s how removal works.

---

What’s Actually In These Files

I pulled everything around the gaps. It’s all one email chain from April 10, 2016:

The event: Karyna Shuliak (Epstein’s girlfriend) booked on Delta flight from Charlotte Amalie, St. Thomas → JFK on April 13, 2016.

St. Thomas is where you fly in/out to reach Little St. James. She was leaving the island.

The chain:

• 11:31 AM — AmEx Centurion (black card) sends confirmation to [email protected]
• 11:33 AM — Lesley Groff (Epstein’s executive assistant) forwards to Shuliak, CC’s staff
• 11:35 AM — Shuliak replies “Thanks so much”
• 3:52 PM — Epstein personally emails Shuliak
• Next day — AmEx sends invoice

The unredacted batch (534xxx) reveals the email addresses that are blacked out in the redacted batch (326xxx):

• Lesley Groff: [email protected]
• Ann Rodriquez: [email protected]
• Bella Klein: [email protected]
• Karyna Shuliak: [email protected]

---

The Epstein Email (EFTA00534392)

The document immediately after missing file 534391:

From: "jeffrey E." <jeevacation@gmail.com>
To: Karyna Shuliak
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 19:52:13 +0000

order http://softskull.com/dd-product/undone/

He’s telling her to buy a book. The same day she’s being booked to leave his island.

---

The Book

“Undone” by John Colapinto (Soft Skull Press)

On-sale date: April 12, 2016
Epstein’s email: April 10, 2016

He recommended it two days before public release.

Publisher’s description:

“Dez is a former lawyer and teacher—an ephebophile with a proclivity for teenage girls, hiding out in a trailer park with his latest conquest, Chloe. Having been in and out of courtrooms (and therapists’ offices) for a number of years, Dez is at odds with a society that persecutes him over his desires.”

The protagonist is a pedophile who resents society for judging him.

The author (John Colapinto) is a New Yorker staff writer, former Vanity Fair and Rolling Stone contributor. Exactly the media circles Epstein cultivated.

---

What’s Missing

So now we know the context:

• EFTA00326497 — Between AmEx confirmation and Groff’s forward. Probably the PDF ticket attachment referenced in the emails.

• EFTA00326501 — Between the forward chain and Shuliak’s reply. Unknown.

• EFTA00534391 — Immediately before Epstein’s personal email about the pedo book. Unknown, but its position is notable.

---

Open Questions

1. How did Epstein have this book before release? Advance copy? Knows the author?

2. What is 534391? It sits between staff logistics emails and Epstein’s direct correspondence. Another Epstein email? An attachment?

3. Are there other Shuliak travel records with similar gaps? Is April 2016 unique or part of a pattern?

4. What else is in the corpus from [email protected]?

---

Verify It Yourself

Try the DOJ links (all return errors):

• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00326497.pdf
• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00326501.pdf
• https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 9/EFTA00534391.pdf

Check the torrent: Pull the EFTA numbers I listed. Confirm the gaps. Confirm the adjacencies.

Grep the corpus: Search for “QWURMO” (booking reference), “Shuliak”, “jeevacation”, “Colapinto”

---

Summary

Three files missing from 531,256. All three cluster around one girlfriend’s April 2016 departure from St. Thomas. Same gaps appear in two processing batches 208,000 files apart. One gap sits adjacent to Epstein personally recommending a novel about a sympathetic pedophile, sent before the book was even publicly available.

This isn’t random corruption.

Full analysis + all code: https://github.com/degenai/Dataset9

---

If anyone has the torrent and wants to grep for Colapinto connections or other Shuliak trips, please do. This is open source for a reason.

ysk the page limit has been fixed, it caps out around 9600 for a total of ~197k file entries. Way less than the largest torrent’s 530k. Scraping now to get a list of the files they kept on the DOJ so we can determine which files they don’t want out there. Would be a good lead to further investigate the torrent

Just like I said… In NO way do I trust DOJ… Our only hope is if someone drops the full data set 9 somewhere.

you’re not getting your connection cut off from the place where you’re downloading? That’s huge, could you let me know if you succeed?

Amazing - Once you have the 180GB Set 9 downloaded, I’ll seed.

At this point, my working assumption is that the version you’re downloading should be presumed to be free of CSAM, but we can’t know for sure until we check it. In addition, I assume that legitimate files were also removed from the version you’re downloading, but the legitimate files are preserved in the archives we already have (along with, tragically, the CSAM.)

I think that after you download the 180GB set, we should compare it to our existing files to identify files that were removed. Then, we can identify which of the removed files were CSAM, and which of the removed files were legitimate. Going to be a hell of a task…

From my understanding nobody knows. The DOJ said it was already removed, but the NYTimes claimed they found 40 images of CSAM. The DOJ said they immediately removed them Saturday, but a lot of files that didn’t contain CSAM were also removed. I’ve extracted the 101GB torrent and haven’t come accross any yet, but there’s a ton of files in there too. People have yet been able to download the entire ZIP and are trying to scrape everything individually as far as I know.

As for the legality, I’m not a Lawyer and I don’t live in the states, but It’s all information that’s been released to the public by the US DOJ as required by a court order, so it’s a call that only you can make. With the amount of data that’s already disapeared I’m personally choosing to host it regardless, and I’ll seed whatever anyone else can salvage of dataset 9 too.

wondering the same thing myself. Not sure about the latest DS9 dump, but I’ve definitely seen some of the other leaks that included some CSAM. crazy that DOJ let that out the door. :/

Any luck?

What’s your method for getting the zip file without being cut off by the CDN?

Good… I don’t trust the what the DOJ says if I see it from my own eyes that’s one thing, and I’ll promptly delete it. But I don’t believe anything the DOJ says.

I’ve been trying all day to get chunks from that CDN…

I can also help seed. Ive got lots of TB’s free.

My two cents I have nothing but daughter…all my children are just daughters…

We don’t take care of this weird sexual abuse problem now between authority, figures and other things like that. We never will…

I don’t think I could sleep at night if I didn’t do my due diligence because someday time will just move on and all of us will be too old to do something about it…

We either take care if this now or we never will as a society …

You think about it do you ever think there will be another point in the future to root out this kind of evil?

So I say release the files and let the chips fall where they fall but that’s just my two cents…

Would be one thing if this entire process felt like we could really trust justice to do the right thing…

Just look over there in the Epstein form on Reddit. They are all kinds of pictures and names of really really wealthy people that can just easily buy their way out of trouble…

It’s “great” that the DOJ removed CSAM at the same time as they were removing perfectly legitimate files that are in the public interest. That’s just really smart. Puts us all in a hell of a bind.

I can’t speak for others, but I’ll plan to preserve the 87GB Set 9, the 90GB Set 9, and Set 10, until we can get an updated “complete” (current) Set 9 that can be presumed to be free of CSAM. After that, we can try to identify the legitimate files that are missing from the “complete” Set 9, and preserve those while purging the CSAM.

And have you seen this or are you speculating?

It’s literally left-in on purpose to try to have something over people that download and/or seed the torrents. We need a file-list to know what not to dl/seed, or a new torrent for that set.