- raicon@lemmy.worldEnglish2 months
no source code
no paper
no open protocol definition
full of emojis
LMAO
glowie@infosec.pubEnglish
1 monthYea it’s just some vibe coded garbage. It being littered with emoji is the dead giveaway.
muusemuuse@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
2 monthsSo it makes a swarm and distributes pieces of the site all over the internet. Theoretically, the original peer can go down and the site keeps running.
Thats not how i2p works. I2p works in a different way and solves a different problem.
However, i2p CAN torrent so technically you could stack this technology in top of it.
neatchee@piefed.socialEnglish
2 monthsPerhaps that is the point: peer auditing instead of blind forwarding
- tomalley8342@lemmy.worldEnglish1 month
The kinds of communities you align yourself with is up to you, I suppose.
- pimpampoom@lemmy.zipEnglish2 months
I am sorry but this is so clearly vibe coded and lazily, i would not trust the security of that thing one second…
- Allero@lemmy.todayEnglish2 months
A question: can you modify the site once it’s published?
Because the uses for a never-changing site are quite limited.
ripcord@lemmy.worldEnglish
2 monthsAlso, the content is statically-generated only, I guess? No server-side rendering? No POSTing, etc? Or…is this creating some cache based on a real server it contacts…?
bufalo1973@piefed.socialEnglish
1 monthServer side rendering includes showing a list of 10 elements in a catalog of 10K elements. Do you really want to transfer all the catalog to each client every time?
bufalo1973@piefed.socialEnglish
1 monthWho says I’m a “web guy”. It’s only that a server has its uses and a client has its uses. Sending all the DB to the client is as bad as streaming an FPS from a server.
- 1 month
How it that different from IPFS? ipfs.tech
Or even better Veilid?
- Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish1 month
Not too different vs IPFS, essentially the IPFS network if it was using WebTorrent. Both rely on swarms of p2p users/servers to seed/pin data to keep it online.
I’m not too familiar with Veilid but that does seem different since it’s built for privacy so I doubt all the peers are public in that scenario. There is nothing private about IPFS or WebTorrent, all peer IP addresses are public in their respective swarms.
Teknikal@eviltoast.orgEnglish
1 monthMight be because I’m on Ironfox maybe but it just stays on connecting to peers for me with nothing else happening. So yeah not one for me.
- Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish2 months
Not really. Decentralized does not mean anonymous… and I doubt people sharing that type of content are doing it publicly with their public IP addresses.
Looks like PeerWeb uses WebTorrent - so that means every single IP address serving the website is easily found in the peer list of the torrent swarm. Nothing anonymous about this.
- 1 month







