• kadu@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I actually agree with this decision. If you’re privacy minded, what the hell are you doing on Discord? At the very least, learn Matrix.

    But for your average user, let’s recall there are literal pedophile rings on Discord. This is still on-going in 2026, they pay low-tier YouTubers to promote their channel to children, children join, they get blackmail material on them (especially young girls) and then force then to do sexually explicit transmissions, record it, and sell it. This is not one example, there are hundreds per day.

    So you know what? Yes, require age verification.

    • lurch (he/him)@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      neither face scan, ID nor age restricted servers can fix that.

      the bad guys can even make a server specifically for kids to get them on there while most adults, who could have noticed coincidentally, would then use an adult server and can’t notice any more.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yea, because no one can fake their way in.

      Keep on licking the boots of the people who want to abuse you…

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yea, because no one can fake their way in.

        Then don’t lock your doors, there are ways around that too.

        Keep on licking the boots of the people who want to abuse you…

        In what part of “learn how to use Matrix” and “they host pedophile rings” did I give you the impression I like or use Discord at all, genius?

    • French75@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Are you suggesting that Discord didn’t have any technical means to detect and ban that activity before? And that having face scans of some users not only gives them that ability, but it’s the most reasonable and sensible way to achieve it?

      • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Are you suggesting that Discord didn’t have any technical means to detect and ban that activity before?

        I’m suggesting that’s irrelevant in face of the magnitude of the issue, versus the irrelevancy of the threat here. I see no reason why a person obsessed with not showing ID would join Discord. It’s like joining a Facebook group and complaining the admins aren’t protecting your privacy.

        • Turret3857@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Most FOSS projects have Discords for some god-forsaken reason and will not help you unless you join their Discord. Events I attend socially choose to use Discord. I am forced into this ecosystem. I only use the web app, ive never installed it on my phone, never given them a phone number, and use a temp email for every account, of which I make a new account for every server I need to be in.

          Stop with this bullshit both siding, its bad for everyone prick.

          • Draconic NEO@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            We need to socially stigmatize developers who choose to use discord and “like and prefer to use it”. The only real way people will migrate from discord is if it’s socially icky to be on Discord.