The drive has been only been powered on and used for read over the last 3+ years. CrystalDiskInfo reports it’s bad but CrystalDiskMark shows decent read/write speeds. Only wrote to it in the very beginning when I dumped a lot of archives into it. Otherwise, very few actual write cycles which is making me think it’s still ok to use. However, this isn’t a NAS drive and is consumer-grade bought many years ago.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Thats bullshit. I have multiple drives that have pending sector count higher then 1 and they perform perfectly fine after that for years now.

    • tenchiken@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Calling it bullshit is funny.

      Just because it might be working for you, the reliability of the drive under load is compromised.

      This literally means there’s data changes awaiting a new replacement chunk to be allocated after a region deemed unstable. If this number doesn’t return to zero I a timely fashion, it means there’s data changes unwritten.

      If you run a raid, expect issues from any drives with pending sectors.

      This is from experience managing statistics on dozens of data centers… Not sure what ShortNotes use case is, but my priority on a storage device is data integrity.

      • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        For data integrity you do not rely on single drives but on for example FS that handle that.

        As i said in another post, the important thing about smart is not the values itself but if they are start to increase or not.

        And even if an read error occurs, the sector gets remapped and you can restore the block/file from backup or the fs will handle it without interference.

        • tenchiken@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Ok, but that doesn’t work on hardware raid. Regardless, his drive has already failed remapping and it’s dying.

          I use ZFS too. That’s not the issue.

          This is pointless since the op asked about single drive and the numbers show it’s failing. Pending means stuck, and uncorrected means it won’t get any better.

          In this case , they shouldn’t trust the disk with anything they care about. That’s it.

          • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes in this case i would not disagree. The overall stats look no good and if it is a single drive then yes. Get the data off.

            I take issue with the general statement of yours:

            If that number stays anything not 0, that means it’s toast. Can’t rely on it.