• XLE@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    If you think an extra layer of universal surveillance will somehow prevent children from being harmed, I have bad news for you. It won’t. Plenty of them will get online anyway, and go to even sketchier sites than ever.

    • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Reread my second sentence.

      We are both in the privacy community: I don’t want ANYONE knowing how kids utilize the internet, or should anyones’. These mandatory biometric laws need to be destroyed completely.

      • XLE@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        Maybe I misunderstand your point, then, especially if it was sarcastic… I didn’t downvote you so maybe I’m not the only one.

        I also don’t get the biometrics thing. They aren’t a great way of locking down your device, they’re just better than nothing as a very basic theft deterrent when used locally.

        • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I am attacking that bullshit headline theguardian allowed, and the thesis of the article. As private-conscious members of this community we need to physically remove these biometric laws by force, and destroy social media whose entire business models depend on violating privacy: We need to be against both, in order to maintain internet privacy.