• General_Effort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Uh. You do understand that this law breaking includes not cracking down hard enough on illegal content? Like that Hamas slogan?

    • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I’m expressing how much their laws are bullshit. they are draconically applied on people protesting a genocide. while the question of “should the law be applied to corporations” is left open as a debatable topic.

      Laws are made to protect the ingroup and bind the outgroup.

      and even though it was an example of their hypocrisy and not the point of the argument I’ll say it regardless

      From the river to the sea Palestine will be free

      From the sea to the river Palestine will live forever

      • General_Effort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Uh. So… Prosecuting bad. Not prosecuting those who do not cooperate with the prosecutors also bad because hypocrisy.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Do you think maybe some laws can be bad and others good and that encouraging enforcement of a good law doesn’t mean encouraging enforcement of the bad ones?

          • 🍉 Albert 🍉@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 minutes ago

            my point is: Why when it comes to the public, laws are enforced to the letter, but for corporations, the question of “should the law apply” is a public debate instead of a “Duh. of course”?