9 hours
They’re basically minimum-viable products that by design can be used to violate the law in California when the Act goes into effect on Jan. 1, 2027.
You must log in or register to comment.
- 5 hours
By the way, the current age verification madness is a coordinated lobbying campaign by Meta
- 7 hours
Can someone eli5 the idea? I don’t get it, even after reading the page. But now I want one.
- 13 minutes
I agree, but now I am torn because I’m protesting the US as a whole right now.
- Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.netEnglish6 hours
They’re breaking evil age verification laws on purpose as civil disobedience with cheap hardware
- 6 hours
OK, the disobedience was the part I didn’t get. Thank you!
- Fluffy Kitty Cat@slrpnk.netEnglish6 hours
Insofar as part availability isn’t insurmountably impacted this also constitutes functional resistance to all manor of censorship and surveillance. If you can code, test on one of these
- 6 hours
I can, but I probably won’t, because my backlog is full and overflowing. But it is cheap… damn.
- jws_shadotak@sh.itjust.worksEnglish7 hours
California is adding a requirement for age verification for operating systems (or something like that) so each one of these violates that law by booting into linux.
- 5 hours
Not just California. Several other US states are considering (or will be rolling out) similar laws, and Brazil’s version has already rolled out this month.
- 6 hours
This was the part I got. But I wondered how that would help?
- 6 hours
Except it’s not age verification and as see n by the systemd fork over this, the people hyperventilating over adding an API are making less secure systems
- MrSulu@lemmy.mlEnglish7 hours
Brilliant. I’d like to see how the very uninformed legislators deal with this. They will have to publically re-argue first principles
