• No-one commenting seems to have read the article. They are raising the recommended specs due to desktop software and web sites being more resource intensive.

    Edit: to add, I would not recommend 6GB RAM for desktop use to anyone. I would say the very minimum is 8GB nowadays.

  • 2 hours

    AFAIK perfomance and low resource usage has never been a main objective of this distro

    • Ubuntu is bloated

      Debian requires at least 512MB of memory and 4GB of hard disk space for installation.

      • 1 hour

        Memory requirements does not mean that something is bloated.

        Windows XP required 64 MB of RAM. Does it mean Debian is bloated then?

  • I have an idea of how they could reduce the fish requirements.

    How about using shared libraries instead of bundling everything in every snap all the times?

    Amazingly it reduces RAM usage as well.

  • 2 hours

    Can we start calling Bloatbuntu like we call it Microslop

  • 1 hour

    I guess it was inevitable (for multiple reasons). Fortunately, there are lighter flavors of Ubuntu. For the more experienced unwilling to spend their resources this way, there are always other distros.

  • I’m not up on the flavours of Ubuntu, but I assume the LTS version is more server oriented and what in the name of whatever you hold holy is there that needs 6 GB to boot an OS? Have they ported bash to electron?

    • The server version requires 1.5 GB of RAM. That’s still rather bloated considering Debian only requires 512 MB.

      • Well, that’s a lot more sensible but still rather fat. Good reminder not to install Ubuntu then.

  • 1 hour

    Rising requirements during the current hardware distribution crisis is just an awesome move