- pageflight@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
Ah, according to Anthropic. Yep, straight into the toilet with the rest of the slop.
- postscarce@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish2 hours
Judges and Magistrates are the legal jobs most threatened by AI? That seems… unlikely.
Lumidaub@feddit.orgEnglish
3 hourslol “legal”
My husband’s employer keeps using AI to look up legal cases to support their arguments in labour disputes and it’s ALWAYS hallucinations.
- 2 hours
“Management” data is simply incorrect. AI can do almost all management tasks today.
It is interesting how many jobs are supposedly threatened, while also being jobs in which accuracy is critical. The specific thing AI is bad at.
- chisel@piefed.socialEnglish41 minutes
AI absolutely can not do even a significant portion of management tasks today. I wouldn’t trust an AI to manage a picnic at the park, let alone people’s livelihoods.
- dream_weasel@sh.itjust.worksEnglish2 hours
Have you ever talked to anyone in “healthcare support” over the phone? That shit could be improved by switching 100% to AI right now. It’s a revolving door of people who don’t want or understand the job and don’t give one quarter of one shit about it. We could improve central scheduling overnight, at least AI might pretend to look at provider notes.
- 3 hours
The “What AI could theoretically perform” column should just be 100% straight down if we are pulling shit out of our asses anyways.



