Today I Learned@lemmy.worldbyQuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works
6 hours

TIL tigers don't have slit pupils like housecats

English

this is moreso an observation I made while googling around and I don’t really have a reason but here’s what an article had to say:

Interestingly, large felines like tigers and lions do not have slit-shaped pupils but round-shaped. The reason for this is not exactly defined, but it is thought to be due to their greater height off the ground, their behavior as active foragers rather than ambush predators, or differences in their circadian rhythms compared to cats.
https://www.catster.com/lifestyle/why-do-cats-have-slit-pupils/

12
    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.worldEnglish
      17 minutes

      You knew this. Just imagine the tiger with slit pupils and your brain will “wtf”. Same with panthers, lions, snow leopards, mountain lions…

    • BromSwolligans@lemmy.worldEnglish
      1 hour

      I love looking at big cats for this reason. There’s something so cute about them having people-ish (or dog-ish, as you please) eyes.

    • krigo666@lemmy.worldEnglish
      4 hours

      Pallas’s cats (manul) seems to be an anomaly then, they are about the size of the domestic cat and also doesn’t have slit pupils.

      • homes@piefed.worldEnglish
        3 hours

        In fact, they are the only ones that don’t. They are so old, they existed before the slit eye evolved in small cats!

        • SippyCup@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1 hour

          Ok. First of all, that’s a cool ass looking cat. I’d never heard of them before and that has brought some joy to my already pretty joyful morning.

          Second of all, you’d think that were there some pressure to do so, they would have evolved similar features if it was an advantage due to their size yeah? It’s gotta be an environmental thing or some combination of the two. The slit eyes tend to blur the sides of your vision but bring things directly in your line of sight in to more clarity.

      • Eheran@lemmy.worldEnglish
        5 hours

        No, it make sense, not everyone realizes that it is actually an artefact and not part of the eye.

        • forrgott@lemmy.zipEnglish
          5 hours

          And a good thing they drew it in, then labeled it as irrelevant, too! Can you imagine how confusing the diagram would be otherwise!?

            • Dozzi92@lemmy.worldEnglish
              1 hour

              It’s visible on human photos too, but when I go to my doctor’s office the diagram of the human eye doesn’t have it. That is a really strange thing to include in the diagram. I like it though, strange is good.