• I really have never understood the intense hate brutality architecture gets.

    But also honestly kinda love this. Almost reminds me of neo-Andean architecture

    • It’s the feelings it evokes on people. Brutalist architecture is very offputting.

  • Ok I kinda love it though. But also I think brutalism at its best can be pretty good even though I think most of what it does well art deco does better (except create a sense of communal bureaucracy)

  • JFC what a difference

    The lower isn’t directly my style but it’s beautiful in its own way

    The upper one is just Hitler’s death bunker or something

  • i mean adjust the pigments off of primary colors and i’m there, but that ain’t so bad. i especially like that hue of blue

  • I kind of like brutalist architecture, especially the interior design. It’s kind of soothing to be around, especially when it’s combined with plants.

      • the public university i went to had lots of funds. the part of it i went to looked like this. for some reason it always felt like i was in an underfunded classroom. it bothered me.

      • 10 hours

        I love that aesthetic personally, especially compared to hyper clean hospital looking buildings

        • Not to mention, the Brutalist architecture interior will look the same in 20 years, while any other kind would just look dilapidated and aged as shit. As long as someone is living in there, concrete don’t age, son. And even if it falls apart, just make some more concrete to fill it in.

          • Maybe this is just my Northeast US prejudice, but brick is so much classier. Also concrete doesn’t age, but rebar sure does

            • Tell that to the romens, concrete ags fantastically if built for the purpose of lasting a long ass time.

              • Roman concrete is unreinforced, meaning no rebar inside to rust. You can’t use modern construction techniques with unreinforced concrete. It can’t handle tension well.

                • Seriously, there’s a reason we don’t “build like the Romans”. We would be using 10x the concrete that we use now. We can’t even keep up with concrete demand now, I can’t even imagine how much worse the environment would already be if we needed 10x the concrete.

  • “prime”
    Uses primary colours
    I see what you did there

  • Someone in the 1930’s must have wanted to paint the Maginot Line. That was a long-ass line of brutal concrete structures. Maybe a snake, maybe rainbows. Imagine that France had a colorfully gay Great Wall.

      • (the maginot line actually did its job of forcing the germans to attack through belgium. the real failure was in maintaining their relationship with belgium and tehn the french command structure being rather feckless)

      • Nah we french people need that hole to buy good beers and cigarettes for cheap

    • 13 hours

      Maybe a snake, maybe rainbows

      This is why I never found a pot of gold.

  • 17 hours

    I was told living in Legoland wasn’t actually an option. I feel lied to.

  • When they were made brutalist buildings were supposed to be human centric structures. Made to be painted and gathered in.

    • The problem with brutalism is they are playing with space and light that can look beautiful but looks like shit the minute humans actually live in them.

      Your big concrete box is cool but where do I put the fucking laser printer.

    • Yeah and malls were supposed to be egalitarian public spaces with plants and housing.

      Can’t have nice things under capitalism.

      • Most malls in China are built into residential towers. They sometimes have gardens and museums, but its a far cry from the archology visions that the architects of the first malls had.

        • I kinda love it. “We packed a town’s worth of people in this building so we included a virtual town center in it as well”

    • Idea: 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟

      Execution: 🌟🌟

      They are dark looming alien structures not fit for humans. If you don’t believe me go live in one. Visiting (or just seeing a photo) is clearly not enough