- Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
I’m not necessarily in favor of data centers. That said, every time I see something like this I just wonder when we are going to start hearing about data centers being built in poor countries powered exclusively by coal and zero regulation. I really have no idea what a good outcome looks like but playing ultra hardball seems unwise. I’m very poorly educated on data centers and AI in general. But, I am an expert in electrical generation. I know we could do it pretty clean, at least relative to coal/heavy oil. I don’t think stopping data centers built in the US will magically cease the boulder rolling in the AI direction. Seems like the money is at its back so its going to happen, just a matter of when, where and how dirty.
SpaceCowboy@lemmy.caEnglish
45 minutesThe US will soon be the poor country that’s powered by coal and zero regulation.
- acosmichippo@lemmy.worldEnglish40 minutes
My understanding is natural gas is cheaper than coal nowadays because the waste heat can be captured and reused.
- gibmiser@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Prohibit them from producing their own electricity. Force them to invest in and use renewables.
- Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
How would that look? Wouldn’t inventing in and using renewables be producing their own electricity? Or do you mean force them to be tied to the grid but also force them to force the grid to use renewables.
- Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
It’s pretty easy to regulate this:
- Closed loop cooling
- grid upgrade built into design plans, paid for by the datacenter.
- cleaner power generation
- officermike@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
I’d say your list is a bit too short. Some more considerations (not comprehensive):
- Construction noise and seismic limits (nearby neighborhoods have been disturbed and experienced damage from blasting operations)
- Operating noise limits (ban on-site gas turbine generation, limit noise levels from cooling towers)
- Limit light pollution
Edit:
- Job protections and guarantees for workers displaced by automation
- grue@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Data centers ought to only be allowed in rural areas to begin with. Even if the noise/vibration/heat/etc. weren’t an issue they’re still a goddamn hole with zero foot traffic, and that’s just bad urbanism. They’re like public storage warehouses, but even worse.
They need access to the Internet backbone, but that doesn’t mean they have to be in cities. Put 'em somewhere along the fiber halfway between.
- Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Datacenters aren’t responsible for workers displaced by automation.
Construction and noise aren’t special to datacenters and don’t need special regulation.
- Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish2 hours
On this particular topic, the more red tape the better. These companies are shady and will find any loophole available to circumvent any protection the current laws are meant to provide.
- Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
That’s how you end up getting republicans elected into local office: by putting up unnecessary or complicated barriers.
Additionally, I believe we’ll be in a really bad situation in the next 10-25 years in regards to access to advanced CPUs. The more we onboard now the more we’ll have later.
It’s also a concern of national security if we put up enough barriers that people and companies put their resources in datacenters in other countries that can’t defend them against attack.
- Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish59 minutes
you like boot huh
I neex to switch to voyager so I can tag you as “likes boot”
- Brkdncr@lemmy.worldEnglish56 minutes
I try to be realistic. I dream of having every thing perfect to my liking but then I look at my neighbors and understand that we have to live together somehow.
- BorgDrone@feddit.nlEnglish3 hours
Job protections and guarantees for workers displaced by automation
Jobs are a necessary evil, not a goal in itself. The goal should be to eliminate all jobs.
Until that time we should figure out a better way to share the burden of the work that nerds to be done as well as better way to distribute resources. Trying to preserve jobs is not the way.
- Hackworth@piefed.caEnglish4 hours
I have first-hand experience living near a source of infrasound, and oh my god, it’s terrible. Here’s a good video about the infrasound generated by data centers.
- Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
What type of generation are you envisioning here? What type of cooling systems?
- Zarxrax@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
I think there are definitely ways to do these data centers that have minimal external impacts, but it costs money and time, and they are trying to rush these through as fast as possible.
- 5 hours
You basically understand what the people with a vested interest in making AI happen want you to know. The truth is that AI is already starting to crumble. It’s a technology that doesn’t do 99% of the things it’s perported to do, and will never do 90% of what they sold it on.
- Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
Yeah I’m not versed in the subject enough to say/think you’re wrong necessarily. I do know the general slant Lemmy’s population has against it though.
- 52 minutes
Just simply ask yourself, why are all the AI companies discussing going public now? I hope you would agree that AI as it currently stands is far from the human brain replacement it was sold as. Outside of a few very specialized fields it’s basically an email generator. They’re out of training data for all intents and purposes. AI generated content is so ubiquitous now that you can’t use most data moving forward without painstakingly checking it all, and AI is becoming increasingly harder to distinguish cheaply or easily. The widespread adoption has poisoned the well. So AI is as advanced as it’s going to be, and it’s not worth its valuation. They’re all racing for the exit and IPOs are their last hope for their backers to sell and get out before the markets stop being irrational. I hope I’m wrong but that seems to be the writing on the wall.
Edit: they’re also already posturing the current administration for a bailout deal.
- grue@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
Lemmy’s population is overrepresented by software engineers who know more about how LLMs actually work than the general public does. Let that sink in.
- boonhet@sopuli.xyzEnglish3 hours
Also a field disproportionately affected by it so still kinda biased
iamthetot@piefed.caEnglish
4 hoursGenAI as it currently stands is a fancy text predictor. You ever had your phone suggest the next word in a message you’re typing? It’s that, on crack.
When you really wrap your head around the fact that that is all it’s doing, it loses a lot of its appeal imho. Especially for the cost to do so.
Jhex@lemmy.worldEnglish
4 hoursI’m not necessarily in favor of data centers. That said, every time I see something like this I just wonder when we are going to start hearing about data centers being built in poor countries powered exclusively by coal and zero regulation
that’s exactly what they are doing right now
- Deep@sh.itjust.worksEnglish5 hours
Nothing will change. This won’t get passed. It’ll all get brushed under the rug and the Democrats will keep the status quo as usual
- BigMacHole@thelemmy.clubEnglish5 hours
PROGRESSIVES introduced Legislation DIRECTLY to Help the Republicans they Talked to WEEKS earlier? I’m SURE Republican Voters will remember this during the next Election when they vote for
Progressives!The EXACT Same people they Complain about! - 5 hours
If the Democrats were willing to negotiate at all, this would be an excellent starting point. Sadly, they’re going to stomp their feet and hold their breath until the whole thing gets scrapped and we’re back where we started. Part of me wonders if that isn’t the point.
- 37 minutes
Do you understand much money was spent to spread your point of view as a method to get people to stop voting?





