• kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    There are only two reasons softwares goes for decades without being replaced:

    1. It’s so unimportant that nobody uses it
    2. It’s so important that the last major bug was squashed 15 years ago
    • britaliope@kourjetez.bzh
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      Also : it’s very complex and it happens to work fine for decades.

      If one day i write a code project and manage to make it work without any major issues for several decades, there is no way i attemptto rewrite it.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yeah, there’s almost 100 years of law, case law and agency regulations built into how this software works. And they fired all the people that knew anything about it.

    • EarlGrey@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 days ago

      But dude, bro, we could put the entire system on the blockchain man, and make it super efficient with an AI backend that will remove all errors bro.

      Dude it’s not even written in Rust bro. WTF is this dinosaur shit?

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I don’t think Rust is a bad language for doing same things people do with C++, but with a smaller standard and less legacy.

        But yep, that’s the kind of people.

        About dinosaur things - I’ve started learning Tcl/Tk and it’s just wonderful.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s so important that the last major bug was squashed 15 years ago

      There are no such systems. What instead happens is that the surrounding business process gets distorted to work around the unfixed major bugs. And then, everyone involved retires and nobody knows anymore why things are done that way.

      • kibiz0r@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        I know devs like everything to be perfect, but if your business can work around it for 15 years without fixing the bug or replacing the system, I dare say it doesn’t qualify as a major bug.