This makes sense, thanks! How precisely does an IP address give me away? State level, metropolitan area, city, street?
- 2 Posts
- 8 Comments
Hi, I’ve been using the DDG browser and search on and off for a bit. Specifically trying to contain more controversial stuff like politics into it. .
I just searched on the DDG browser with the DDG search, “2026 midterm primary results” hoping to find the 5 states that had primaries last night. The top horizontal scrolling results were all Michigan. Then the fucking AI bot that I thought I turned off. Then finally the real results…except the real results were 100% local to my state. My states primaries were months ago. There is no rewsonvehy my search should have yielded anything local to my state, and certainly not the entire first page.
Can someone shed a light onto why it would have done this? It feels invasive, at least with Google I can pretend that they know my location because I told them. But DDG? Nah, shits weird.
- A_be_seedy@beehaw.orgto
Privacy@lemmy.ml•Rep. Thomas Massie Announces Federal Bill to Defund Flock Surveillance Cameras - Don't Flock
7 daysI actually saw some praise on Flock today on Facebook. Youre probably right
Why might it not be for me? It looks sharp!
All of this makes sense and you were dead on with assumptions! Thank you!
Its looking good to me! I can’t figure out if the 5 family members is the max that could upload pictures or if 20 or so people could occasionally upload pictures to designated folders. Do you know?
What would be some of the benefits of Immich? Is it just a lot of upfront tinkering or constant tinkering?
Thanks! With both of these, can anyone with access add pictures? Predominantly its coming from my fiance and I, but I could see up to 20 people wanting to upload their own pictures of our baby.
Also, is there any service that allows for comments/light social media features?
I love the end-to-end encryption!
I have a baby and I’ve been real wary of posting her pictures on social media. My fiance is Inna similar boat but more OK with big tech (or at least, doesn’t have the tech background to look for alternatives).
My family lives far away. Right now, we just text pictures every week. But I’d like to have a place where we could share the pictures, and maybe everytime we share it’d send an email to those that want to see them updating - something they should be able to set (my mom would want notifications every time, my siblings might prefer a weekly digest).
Basically, Google Photos would work. Instagram or Facebook might be better. But I don’t want big tech feeding my baby to AI.
I have a post covid laptop (Dell Inspiron) that I don’t use much. Occasionally, I do use it, could I self host on that? I don’t think I can justify a service being more than $30ish a month.
I’m thinking about creating an instance of Pixelfed (or whatever its actually called)
I obviously want it to be locked the fuck down. My sister in law is having a baby soon too, I think if they like our photo sharing method, they might want to use ours. Would I be able to give them control to choose who can view pictures of their baby? I’ve like how on Lemmy the owner of the instance has to individually approve people, but I wouldn’t want to be doing that for my sister in laws family - just give her and hubby access to approve and deny.
Is paid web hosting the better and less techy way to go about this? I don’t work in tech, and I don’t have lots of time to troubleshoot, so the easier the better, if there’s a trustworthy service for my needs too. I’m not too intimidated by a more difficult/techy setup, but I want low maintenance. If I do use a web hosting service, does anyone have recommendations for ethical hosts that won’t just feed our data to AI? Obviously not using AWS.

I mean, sure, I could have had a more specific search. I just assumed that DDG was privacy focused and more or less gave the same search results to everyone.
My states midterms happened months ago, and weren’t particularly newsworthy then. Let alone now.
Given the newsworthiness of Michigan, especially, and 4 other states last night, I would have expected to see results skew towards the trending news story as opposed to old, largely irrelevant, results that skew towards knowing who is performing the search.
It’s backwards of my expectations with the product. And based on my understanding of how search engines operate, youvare more likely to catch search engine bias with broad sweeping searches, than you would with hyper specific searches. As an example, this search was able to identify that DDG biases location over relevance/newsworthiness. Which is why I asked about it in the community I did.
I wasn’t complaining about the effectiveness of the search, rather the privacy concerns.