I mean you can just say that if you really want
Yes we get your point, you dont get the point that it leaves them liable to regulators defining it and finding themselves out of compliance with the yet to be defined rules
No i dont read that shit because i dont care if zuckerberg listens in on my twilight imperium games lmao
That’s what he’s saying, they’re in violation. Your comment begs the question “is everything big companies do legal and compliant?”
I mean most of the games i play are just board games on the pc, less cleanup and easier to play with others on discord than meeting IRL
I thought legion go ran steamOS??
Exactly “being smart” and “acting smart” are two different things. Usain Bolt is the “fastest” man on Earth, but if he’s just chilling on the couch watching TV, I can run right past him.
Same with these ivy league CEOs, they probably (not necessarily) were smart when taking their tests in school, but if they just leave the fate of their company to chatgpt responses, they’re acting as dumb as possible at the current moment.
That’s another thing broken about AI, they just make you look more like a kardashian because they have more pictures on the web than anyone else, it’s just gross tbh
That’s not the point, the point is everyone wants to pay less taxes but also they want the government to subsidize their industry and run a balanced budget. It’s just greed and narcissism, nobody actually wants to make the country better. They just say that to advocate for free money for themselves.
Most people just dont care or notice. They go to work get money and then go to walmart snd buy whatever is cheapest. Theyre used to ads everywhere so they buy the ad infected tv and dont even notice anything wrong, ads are just a mundane fact of life.
Whats the benefit of using a smart tv for your computer?
Yes, there’s a huge difference between selling something with transparent pricing versus offering it as a gambling prize.
The issue is not the price, it’s the addictive gambling mechanic. It’s not about making sure steam doesn’t rip people off, it’s about making sure steam doesn’t get kids addicted to gambling.
I mean it’s the classic revolutionary’s dilemma – does bringing the system down, which causes incredible amounts of death and suffering for the poor, worth it in the long run? IMHO it never is, because the system always finds the most painful and evil ways to go down, with no guarantee the next system is any better.
Ideally the system itself improves over time like we saw happen in the 20th century in a lot of other countries, and social democracy takes over peacefully. But sometimes the capitalists won’t let that happen and insist on a tragic and violent decline instead.
I guess my point is they used to have a lot more power in China than they do now. It didn’t have to be this way, the oil billionaires and automobile CEO could have found a way to monopolize renewables and EV technology at home too. They just operated off of fear and laziness instead of bravery and industriousness.
But that’s what im saying – high tarrifs doesn’t skow down technological innovation in China, of course they’re way ahead of us now on EV technology. Yes, they did it to keep power over their United Statesian subjects, by keeping us in the dark they have more control over us. China didn’t slow down at all because of that.
A very large number of us are creeps.
I mean they made millions of Pintos so yeah