data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5464a/5464adde2526b48afb3073a5870350f2d29fcc8f" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
Banning TP-Link routers isn’t going to do a damn thing to solve the problem of insecure routers, SOHO or otherwise. Too many people and companies set shit up and then ignore it until it breaks and under these conditions routers are always going to become insecure given a long enough timeline.
Fire up Shodan and see how many discontinued Cisco ASAs are out there. Hell you can probably still find some Cisco PIX boxes even though they went away nearly twenty years ago! Those aren’t people doing that, those are COMPANIES.
The problem here isn’t the brand or even the silicon that brand uses. It’s with the utter lack of management (including EoL replacement) by the people using the damn things.
The author of the article. It doesn’t take long to uncover their politics and they are absolutely not involved in any right wing conspiracy.
There’s nothing really wrong with substack. People just like to shit on anything that doesn’t pass whatever purity test they happen to use.