data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64727/64727419b3c912e172d8949314d9b37d9feeeca2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1df69/1df69f53f5559e83c288e08b403109544e78dc05" alt=""
What are the chances of seeing Liz only wearing her truss?
What are the chances of seeing Liz only wearing her truss?
Yeah, tailscale also works fine on arch, by itself. But the problem was with tailscale AND a vpn being installed at the same time, even if only one was active/running. Almost certainly not an issue with arch or tailscale, the vpn was probably the problem.
I went from noob to arch about 3 months ago, and only had to reinstall twice after I broke things. Couldn’t figure out how to get my vpn and tail scale to play nicely together, even if I only used one at a time. After the 2nd attempt/reinstall I just gave up on tail scale, and haven’t had any show stopping bugs/issues since. Sure would be nice if rustdesk played nice with Wayland tho.
I didn’t realize archinstall existed until I had to reinstall, so I can see why a terminal based install from scratch might scare some people away.
Isn’t the most famous honeymooner’s memes:
One of these days, Alice! BANG! ZOOM! Straight to the moon!
Not taking about rockets, he’s threatening to beat his wife
If you look up Carmel Indiana, and the surrounding towns, there are many examples of raised paved multi use trails. They’re actually really nice, but the cities don’t install most of them, the cities are mostly responsible for maintenance. They’re actually installed by housing developers because the cities require it in their zoning. Unfortunately, this can result in a Swiss cheese-like network full of holes and gaps. It’s been getting better over the last couple years as some of those cities (Westfield) took on the responsibility of connecting the neighborhoods, and updated their zoning to require the new neighborhood trails to connect to existing ones.
But is it worse?
This is probably going to sound like a stupid question, but did anyone actually check to make sure there weren’t any major deviations in the English translation of the Icelandic version?
Here’s a video that actually kinda answers the question:
iirc anything after 802.11ac doesn’t allow AP mode on client devices. Something about not being able to scan for restricted channels in 5/6ghz
Ah I see the misunderstanding, the engineers were sacked after they finished writing the code.