data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64727/64727419b3c912e172d8949314d9b37d9feeeca2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5af72/5af7262759f480097251b4e0e292682db4ddd539" alt=""
That sounds really efficient to me!
I don’t know if I would classify it as a bad move, but it’s definitely disappointing. Something like this should have only been deployed as a last resort. Perhaps it was.
Etcher was a good piece of software. As soon as Balena bought it and stuffed their name in front, things started going south. I wish the weird name and shift to an unintuitive icon were the only things that had happened…
XMPP sounds nice and good until you actually take a moment to look at the client selection. For example: which encryption method will they be using, and which ones support that?
How about multi-device? Calls?
The most important section of this post is here (I turn these things into a list):
Over the past six months, we’ve invested in improved tooling for the frontline team who review user reports.
- We’ve sponsored the addition of account suspension to the Matrix Specification, and added a mass redaction API endpoint for the most popular Matrix server implementation, Synapse, so that both the Matrix.org server and other server instances in the ecosystem can benefit. Suspension gives us reversible account enforcement, which means we can develop more automated systems for faster takedown ahead of investigation. This should reduce the time that illegal material is accessible, while enhancing the rights and protections of our users.
- We’ve also recently added authenticated media, stopping abuse of Matrix as a content distribution network. We worked with the IWF on this project, following reports of abuse of Matrix servers as a content delivery mechanism for ICAP sites.
In terms of privacy alone, neither of these points appear to benefit users. #1 benefits law enforcement and room moderators, and #2 benefits server owners, but not really from a privacy perspective.
Could the suspension API be maliciously used to lock down users’ accounts further? Based on this post alone, I can’t tell, but Matrix has a sketchy relationship with consent when it comes to having data deleted. (Constantly referring to their chat app as “like email” is also a bit misleading, the same way that referring to Bitcoin as “crypto-currency” is misleading.)
If you think this is worthy of sharing, please, feel free to share it! Just mention me so I can take a look :)
Frustratingly, doing a search on that Changelog page for sources is mostly full of stuff not relevant to my search.
I did find a different post on Lemmy that talks about it, though. This post is incredibly thorough, and does an excellent job of undoing Kagi’s attempt to memory-hole the information about which sources they use.
This makes it all the more frustrating that Vlad refuses to re-add them, instead asking to know why we would care. Here’s a link to that conversation, which is on a platform controlled by Vlad, which appears to be resistant to archiving services that attempt to fetch those particular comments. Also for posterity:
slamor
Oct 27, 2024
https://help.kagi.com/kagi/search-details/search-sources.htmlThere is really no proper information about search sources. We need to know what resources are used and at what rate.
Please make a more detailed and clear edit.
Vlad
Oct 29, 2024
[@]slamor Is there any particular reason you are asking for this? More context will help us better understand the need.slamor
Nov 2, 2024
[@]Vlad why not?
Searching through kagi.com for “Yandex” yields a lot of dead links. The one living link is the Changelog, which says they added Yandex to their image search, back in December 2024… But that’s hardly a revelation. The changelog doesn’t go back very far either, AFAIK
As for the other links: Google says these links used to contain it the word, but I don’t know why. Maybe this one was for raised sites, maybe it was for lowered sites, which would at least give a little insight into whether users loved or hated the domain…
url: https://europe-west2.kagi.com/stats?sd=asc&st=percentage
text: yandex.com. zlibrary.to. androidcentral.com. answer-all.com. baijiahao.baidu.com. cbc.ca. developer.apple.com. eightify.app. github.getafreenode.com. gitmemory …
Another result seems to suggest Yandex Images served up a photo of Steve Jobs in a demo search, but that is no longer the case. Maybe it’s just a coincidence.
url: https://kagi.com/images?q=steve+jobs
text: 564 x 318 yandex.ru. 20 Steve Jobs Quotes: Wisdom from the Apple Co-Founder 20 Steve Jobs Quotes: Wisdom from the Apple Co-Founder. 696 x 418 cioviews.com. 75 …
Kagi has been criticized for removing their list of partners - originally, they admitted to partnering with Yandex, but they recently hid that partnership after receiving backlash. I’m not sure if the changelog will reflect that information, but I am curious to check now.
In my opinion, email aliasing is the best tool when you share a domain name with a bunch of other people. The more, the merrier!
Hosting a custom domain is cool and all, but unless you share it with friends, two data breaches could tie your accounts together if somebody was reasonably competent about identifying domains that aren’t typically associated with email hosting.
To me, the article almost reads like it was written by a conservative trying to parody liberal ideology. After starting the article from the beginning, I got the distinct impression that the author was saying “hello, fellow liberals” to the audience.
Now, as someone who deeply opposes Trump and everything he stands for, this situation is worrying to say the least.
Especially after seeing significant gaps in information about both Andy Yen’s actions from this author, despite the claims that
I scoured copious amounts of information, thousands of tweets, replies, and comments, as well as blog posts.
It doesn’t help that the author is anonymous and has no other articles to their name.
There are multiple issues with this blog post.
The post falsely assumes Andy Yen’s politics exclusively matter - they don’t. Andy Yen stupidly posted a opinion online, then stupidly got the official corporate Proton account to stupidly repeat it on multiple platforms.
This is the issue: they demonstrated massive corporate mismanagement.
Then the company tried sweeping it under the rug, and many users are unaware about the corporate statements.
The article never addresses that issue. The author probably wishes Andy Yen’s mistake was just political, because that would be easy to write off. But it’s not.
If the CEO is able to bungle something this badly in full public sight, I lose a tremendous amount of trust in the actual product. And because Proton gets a good chance to read over every single email that comes in from an external source - password reset emails, confidential documents, etc - now I’m worried that they could bungle something that I can’t see… Until it’s too late.
If you read this Medium article alone, you might come away with the impression Gail Slater is a champion of small business. After all, it says
Legal experts have described Slater to be “not known as a friend of Big Tech”, and “not good for Google” despite her Republican ties. It is likely that knowing this, Andy was caught by surprise at Trump’s pick…
I was caught by surprise too: this article misses key details about Gail Slater. Several people pointed this out to Andy Yen.
Her Wikipedia page suggests she worked for the FTC before working for a lobbying firm and joining the first Trump administration. Then she worked for Fox and Roku and is now rejoining the Trump administration.
That lobbying group that employed her for four years was the Internet Association.
The Internet Association (IA) was an American lobbying group based in Washington, D.C., which represented companies involved in the Internet. It was founded in 2012 by Michael Beckerman and several companies, including Google, Amazon, eBay, and Facebook…
In 2017, the Internet Association opposed California AB 375, a data privacy bill that would require Internet service providers to obtain customers’ permission to collect and sell their browsing history, citing desensitization and security as the basis for their opposition.
Maybe Andy Yen stupidly didn’t know better when he made his post (as “Proton Team”) when he claimed she had “a solid track record of being on the right side of the antitrust issue”.
But this article should have known.
This article also makes a poor technical assumption: if you read it without knowing better, you’d think Proton isn’t capable of scanning and recording the text of mail as it arrives.
Lines like these
Proton is end-to-end encrypted, meaning it cannot decrypt user data.
tell the reader, either ignorantly or intentionally, the opposite of most email works. Banks, service providers, and password reset emails are all likely to be readable on receipt. E2EE emails in Proton are literally exceptionally rare.
As I understand it, the “first hop” in Obscura’s case would give them access to your IP address, but the identity of the destination server would be obscured until it was accepted by the second hop, Mullvad’s server. In contrast, Mullvad’s server would not see your IP address. (And, hoping you are visiting an HTTPS secured website, they would see the domain you are visiting but not the page contents.)
A helpful diagram is halfway down this page. I feel comfortable providing it, as this company is no longer in business AFAIK.
I thought the point was the telemetry, not ads…
“Propah froitnen innit” is a loose translation
Right after you promise to convince all their moneyed interests to accept those changes into the repositories they manage
There’s also privacy issues with Matrix:
Discord is also one (admittedly very lousy) company, while Matrix starts with the privacy issues and just gets worse
Edit x2: I can’t place a parenthesis to save my life