Why not both?
Why not both?
I assert it’s also immoral, especially in modern times.
That sounds vaguely like The Peter Principal.
And in turn, breeds more psychopathy. I’m fairly convinced psychopathy is, at least partly, explained by epigenetics.
Google’s parent is the alphabet Corp, who started with funding from, and working for the US alphabet agencies.
For calling a politician a pimmel?
3-5% of the population general striking and protesting wildly could turn the tide. People say they can’t afford time off work. They won’t have work, if they don’t. At least not paid work.
Maybe it’s more sinister than that.
Maybe it’s intentional
You can bet he’s more dangerous now.
Can you not grasp the larger implications?
Google is an alphabet agency company. You’re not wrong, but they do, have and are handing that information over to governments, including the current US administration.
I never saw it but read it. Yes, 10/10, highly recommend.
Bradbury called it in Farahenheit 451.
Epic of Gilgamesh.
Anyway, if they were so benevolent and so much smarter than us, why would they impose their will, and especially if interference might make our extinction more rapid?
Hermetic/ kabbalah
Karma and dharma
Esoterica channel on YouTube is pretty neat.
What do you think karma is?
That’s not the point of karma. And thoughts count, so what you wish for others comes back.
But the reason for stripping them of their wealth is that they’re dangerous, we don’t give nukes to violent schizophrenics.
This is being very vividly illustrated, irl.
Stock market was a bookie for rich people. I think you meant 401k.