LLM is being used in a colloquial way here. It’s just how the algorithm is arranged. Tokenize input, generate output by stacking the most likely subsequent tokens, etc.
It still differentiates it from neural networks and other more basic forms of machine “learning” (god what an anthropomorphized term from the start…).
Is it nice to make someone do the mental labor of coming up with a gift?
That is a good scene.
Ehh, wrong movie format. Mostly because by the time someone is literally an enemy combatant, it’s a bit late for words.
Though he has been in a ton of movies by now. If he hadn’t rocketed in to the 21st century by putting himself on ice maybe it could’ve come up.
It’d definitely be a good thing. Point is, getting rid of cars won’t be a good thing until effective alternatives are actually available.
It will always be possible. The punishments need to be very harsh, because white collar crime never “needs” to happen.
water beds… ouch, bad choice for a fucked up back.
That’s not unusual, depending on a few factors. What really matters is how disruptive it is. I do the same, but as long as it’s just a rollover, I can be back to dream land in a minute or two. … unless it was shitty dreams, then I might be missing the rest of my sleep…
Petty crime, sure.
White collar crime is pure greed, though, and that’s 90% of what politicians are doing right now in the US…
There are many motivations for crime, and we need to start punishing the poeple that don’t “have” to do the crime A LOT more harshly, and the people that do “have” to commit the crime far less.
You’re going to need A LOT more public transit already in place before banning cars would ever be a remotely ‘good’ idea.
Thus making you your own problem.
You didn’t say much at all, just insults. It is very much you failing to communicate anything except contempt, so ofc I have to assume.
You are the problem you complain about, dumbass,
Those are far too generic of things to place you on the spectrum more than, “not a conservative fuckwad that doesn’t care about others”, which itself is a huge spectrum.
As Cowbee said, a lot of the differentiation on the left is economic prescription, and your plan for how to bring that prescription in to reality. Most all of the left is socially progressive and accepts others, so that’s not differentiating much.
So… you’re too stupid to understand how knowledge works? You’re too dense to understand the concept of the “known unknown” vs the “unknown unknown”?
You ignorant morons are insufferable to me.
If we were talking about real neural networks that have real complexity to them and not LLMs, I might agree. Though we aren’t. We are still years away from any form of AI being capable of gen AI.
Yes. Yes implying plurality for a singular thing is, by definition, exaggerating.