

How os a seedbox not a VPS?
How os a seedbox not a VPS?
…a third-party services…
Now, what is it, one or many!?
That will still work out with e-ID law in action
The cashier can still take the risk, as they did before not checking ID, as it is only forbidden to give too young people alcohol not required to verify the age. This law is not changed with the e-ID law.
With e-ID law in effect, you can still show physical ID to the cashier without any scanning. E-ID law won’t change that.
Who is “the government” in Switzerland exactly? I see people in favour and against it in “the government” of Switzerland. Or is “the government” just the politicians that disagree with you?
Hahaha, have you even read my comment?
There is a law that will come in effect soon about selling media and games that are age restricted. The seller has to do an age verification. The referendum against it did not get enough signatures. This law will come into effect no matter if e-ID yes or e-ID no. You didn’t have to verify your age yet, because that law is not in effect yet. You will have to upload a picture of your physical ID with unnecessary private data, if e-ID gets not passed. Do you really not understand?
You need to verify age for all these services already, if you offer those. (Except 18+ streaming).
E-ID will not changed those laws.
And if you don’t use these services now, you will not need E-ID then. (Except 18+ streaming)
And if e-ID is declined by the people of Switzerland, you will have to upload ID for 18+ streaming. This law is already thought and can only be stopped with a new initiative.
Yes, but the e-ID won’t change that.
If no e-ID is existent, you’ll have to upload a scan of your real world ID instead, with all unneeded data included.
In Switzerland, any law changes can be prevented by a referendum
So, no, in Switzerland, the law can not just be changed.
There is an article in the proposed law that e-ID is only allowed to be required for actions, where the law explicitly requires authentication.
In this proposed law there is no article that explicitly forces services to require a ID
So it only applies to services that used to require identification since a long time, lime buying alcohol, money laundering protection, some government stuff you had to do physically prior etc.
But there is a new law coming which sadly did mot get a referendum, that requires age verification for 18+ media like video and games. But this law will take effect no matter if e-ID is accepted or not. So if e-ID was declined, you would have to scan the compete ID, do a liveness selfie and send it to private companies like Netflix to watch 18+ stuff there.
With e-ID, you can proof you’re old enough without revealing name, gender, body hight etc.
Please inform yourself correctly before spreading nonsense
😄I guess, I am bad in capitalism 🤣🙃
Fair enough, just thought proposal above would have higher chances to get approved 😇
I would prefer if they force the companies to unlock root and boot-loader, when they not ship security updates anymore for a device.
Fuck copyright
Fuck patents
Fuck capitalism
Bitcoin, and the millions other way more efficient alternatives 😜
I mean, they have no problems offering transaction services to obvious scams like “find sex in your region” and other scammy find relationship websites.
Transaction companies should not play police, in my opinion
In fact no company should play being police
This is why we have the digital market act
How are transaction offering companies not included there? Who gives them the right to choose what people consume?
Way do much centralised power
Basically a dictatorship
Fuck that
Here in Switzerland, the parties in power choose the judges. That works because we have like 10 strong parties and many small ones.
After researching, I found, that the choice of judges isn’t that good in Switzerland either and even too complex to understand for me 😂 guess I had that wrong in mind… It seems to ultimately work on trust, empathy and ethics of individual people 🧐🤔
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/business/switzerland-votes-on-appointing-judges-by-lot/47030624
😆be the change you wish for