“Who controls the past controls the future. who controls the present controls the past.”


aspe:keyoxide.org:LWJJT46QY6F7W5MOKRUD3W6IOY

wiki-user: fxomt

  • 3 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 1 month ago
cake
Cake day: January 21st, 2025

help-circle



  • My original comment was under a hardware thread, but the main interest of it was the paper i linked. The paper itself is better suited to the article but my commentary is not haha.

    I’m very excited for the development of these open source processors, but the average person is probably not going to build their own hardware (for obvious reasons 😅) But i think this is still a huge step for transparency!

    The original point of the paper was for software, which is arguably more malicious (and what the article was talking about) Almost no one can build their entire environment from pure scratch (from the OS to the browser) and even then, how can you prove that the toolchain itself is not malicious or backdoored?

    My point ultimately is that most of this does not matter. There is something close to “true privacy” but never 100%. Privacy is about tradeoffs and compromises, it is still better than exposing yourself completely to the open.


  • I’ll repost an old comment of mine, since it’s relevant:

    True security/privacy is impossible.

    It is a compromise, and it all depends on your threat model; everything is probably “backdoored” some way or another.

    However the productive thing isn’t 100% blocking these risks, it’s mitigating it. It’s not feasible to build your own processor, so for example, choose the least worse between Intel ME and AMD PSP. It’s sad that we have to live in a world where surveillance is everywhere, but this is how it is for now.

    tl;dr: don’t worry too much about these, you’ll still be backdoored one way or another, what is important is making it harder for them