This just seems like an issue of power.
It’s not that the systems of solving disputes are broken in a “I figured it out!” sort of way, but moreso that all systems rely on power, and some people simply have more power.
Changing the system might improve things, I don’t know, but I don’t think your analysis sounds correct.
This feels very weird to read.
What do you mean by verified? I’m not sure there’s such a thing as “verification” on Lemmy, at least.
Sorry guys… My gooning streaks are skewing the data; I’m the masturbations Georg and shouldn’t have been counted…
And now you’re on the Fediverse. I’m thinking there’s something to this cyberastrology stuff…
+1
I picked dbzer0 myself.
Oh right, the email!
Huh, maybe db0?
I’ll pretend you didn’t just make me read about fart-based justice…
I’m not sure it does!
When might made right, naturally that was by fighting. Now, we prefer to have a rule book (laws) for everything and then get a group of random people (jury) to decide who’s right.
So, in the first case, the person with the advantage is the best fighter, and in the second case the person with the advantage is who knows the laws best? Or maybe who can argue their case best.
But no! The person with the advantage is whoever has the power to rig the system, be it by hiring someone to fight in their stead or to hire the better lawyer or to stack the jury or whatever. The “power” I’m talking about is money, by the way, in case that’s not clear, and it doesn’t change depending on the system.
Sure, for the fartvorce (fart divorce) it would be the loudest farter… Or maybe it would be whoever gets to choose the decibel meter by bribing the fart-judge or something. Or maybe it’s whoever can afford the best surgery to implant a fart-enhancer in their rectum! I don’t know… Still, I don’t think changing the system does that much, at least, in terms of stopping people from just throwing money (power) at the problem.