

the government rarely wants to incentivise direct job loss
hater of hidden rules
the government rarely wants to incentivise direct job loss
the primary shareholders of a company can usually do whatever they please (as they should in the case of some proprietorship) as such can sell whatever assets for whatever price.
and if you do that most of the economy fails because no one wants a bond that does nothing
the same happens to most mortgages, namely income goes to the lender and you get a house.
mass killings do not bring sympathy because no individual’s life is brought attention to and there is no emotional investment in them.
is there a KDE equivalent (preferably per app)
you can’t have heros without villains
good for you, mine charges 20¢ a page
and if you do: just get it separately
yet those magnets don’t show the time of day, do they?
completely agree, if kids want a phone at school they can get a dumbphone
because Facebook is an abstract danger, porn is (relatively) well defined
why should any llm care about “ethics”?
blender has a fairly simple video editor
that’s econ 101.
Also the poor should have not seemed desperate.
why should they? it’s basically just a worse version of scaling prices by income, something the government loves doing.
notably not the same thing at all
480mbps is still faster than shitty cloud services
edit: yes I know about usb 1.0 and 1.1
is east Germany not a nationality?
seems fine for anyone that already has a house, like everyone should (for hundreds of years)