I can read his tweet. It makes absolutely no sense as his words are the literal opposite of what is really happening right in front of everyone’s eyes. The only explanation is he is sucking up to the party that is dismantling our democracy for his own financial gain.

Do enlighten us all.

But why support the Nazi sympathizer?

Unless… there’s profit in it. No profit in sending a customer a bomb.

Most peertube instances auto duplicate your YouTube channel for you.

This is already an automatic option on most peertube instances. My guess is most popular creators are not interested in giving up their ad revenue.

So are the social consequences of speech.

Legality has never been morality. Slavery was legal, still technically is.

Because in the kindle store you’re not purchasing the book but a license to the book.

The great switch and the southern strategy.

There’s a difference between blanket firing all probationary employees and putting specific names of people working on regulating his businesses on a list to fire.

If you can’t make that distinction in a discussion of how this is bad, then you are going to be dismissed as biased and making false representations.

There’s plenty of dirt being done without having to make shit up to make it sound worse. The truth matters. People who don’t care about the truth got us into this mess and they certainly aren’t going to get us out of it.

The have all the morale, non of the morals.

Gizmodo is a trash source, they are telling you what you want to hear.

These people were collateral from their scatter shot mass firing of all probationary employees. Breaking the agencies that regulate his businesses is the goal, but they aren’t specifically targeting employees who are regulating his products.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fda-staff-reviewing-musks-neuralink-were-included-doge-employee-firings-sources-2025-02-17/

You know the first people they fired were all the inspector generals right? Those are the watch dogs who investigate where the money is going and watch out for people breaking the law. And they illegally fired the head of the office that protects government whistleblowers. He’s currently counting on the Supreme Court to uphold the law.

I regret that I have but one upvote to give.

This is absurd. Not because of your personal preferences but because you are so naive and narrow minded as to be incapable of imagining another viewpoint. This thinking is why the world is falling apart.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historicity_of_Jesus

This article is well sourced. There is a section on non-christian sources as well. Although that section does not list all the sources I am aware of. It may be excluding Jewish scholars.

It even highlights the view that he didn’t exist as a fringe stance.

There are historical accounts that align with some of the events that as recorded in the Bible. The person existed and went around claiming to be the son of a god. This we know. The rest of it is myth and legend.

Yes, because historians were like “yeah there was a guy named that, so this religious book must be right about him existing.”

Don’t be daft.

Yeshua of Nazareth is a historically confirmed individual. He was real, really the son of a god? Probably not.