This week YouTube hosted Brandcast 2025 in which it revealed how marketers could make better use of the platform to connect with customers.

A few new so-called innovations were announced at the event but one has caught the attention of the internet – Peak Points. This new product makes use of Gemini to detect “the most meaningful, or ‘peak’, moments within YouTube’s popular content to place your brand where audiences are the most engaged”.

Essentially, YouTube will use Gemini and probably the heatmap generated on YouTube videos by people skipping to popular points, to determine where to place advertising. Anybody who has grown up watching terrestrial television where adverts arrive as a way to build suspense will understand how annoying Peak Points could become.

  • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    32 minutes ago

    OK let’s all skip to the middle of sponsor segments so the ads cover the sponsor segment. Win win

  • tooLikeTheNope@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    35 minutes ago

    No one will even blink at ads on most engaging moments in Youtube videos, in Pornhub ones tho…

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Because nothing endears your platform to users like throwing ads in their face during the high points of whatever they are watching.

  • Gronk@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Migrated away from Google because they’re just genuinely useless.

    Search results are infested with AI bullshit and SEO slop, can’t actually search for anything useful unless you know the website you’re looking for, in which case I just go to the website directly.

    Youtube curates a selection of completely irrelevant videos to try to shove ads down your throat, I still have to change my user agent string every time because YouTube throws a hissy fit at firefox with ublock.

    Gmail is pretty much the same as any other email provider but comes at the expense of your data being sold for advertising purposes.

    Don’t even get me started on the shit show that is Android.

    I run GrapheneOS, Fedora and debian, self host what I can and use decent providers for what I can’t. I’m the furthest away from the big tech corps than I’ve ever been and it feels great to have computers that actually compute and not serve me useless fucking ad drivel.

    • SSTF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      I have a Google account specifically for logging into YouTube. I’ve aggressively used the like/hide channel/not interested in this video options to force it to actually show me what I want. It took quite a while to train it, but my YouTube homepage is actually nice right now.

      But every so often I’ll go on YouTube logged out and it’s like staring into the sun. The top videos that it pushes seem like brain melting garbage.

      Strangely I haven’t had any issues with Firefox+Ublock+Sponsorblock. The way YouTube interacts with seemingly the same sets of software for different people is baffling.

    • Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I use YT and have not seen an ad in years. I do not understand people who have not disabled ads.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Most of my favorite channels are on nebula now anyway. Just need Technology Connections and Mark Rober (my kids LOVE Mark Rober) to make the jump.

      • dan69@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I’ve been meaning to try nebula, that lifetime membership sounds hella great!!

  • isaacd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I used to waste a lot of time on YouTube Shorts, which is the absolute worst way to waste time. I finally deleted the YouTube app completely, and aside from a couple days of withdrawals, it’s been all positive.

    I mean, I don’t know anything about the latest video games or movies anymore. And I have to rely on my family to send me Ryan George skits. But that stuff wasn’t actually making my life better, it was just filling it up.

    If I want to watch something interesting on my phone, I’ve got Nebula. It doesn’t have all the same content, but it turns out that doesn’t matter a lot when you just want to be entertained/educated for a couple minutes. (It also doesn’t have a comment section. Or Shorts. So yeah, unequivocally better.)

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      You could use alternatives if you specifically want some videos. Grayjay can play videos from multiple platforms.

  • hightrix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Wow. Fuuuuuuuuck YouTube.

    Also, Firefox plus Ublock Origin makes ads on YouTube go away.

        • dr_robotBones@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It might be something they’re testing. I had it and then it went away for a bit and now its back. I emulate android on my PC just so I can use an app that has no ads.

          • Kushan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Make sure your ublock lists are up to date, sometimes the extension gets a bit stuck and needs a nudge to update them.

            It’s an arms race and Google hasn’t won it yet.

  • golden_zealot@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I swear to god, one of these days the update will be “Today Youtube has announced that they will be removing the annoying videos from their ads”.

    • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 hours ago

      And we’ll doom scroll through ads as though they’re shorts, which I guess they are anyway.

      • TwistedCister@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 hours ago

        We really are getting all media turned into the radio from Demolition Man.

        If I go to YouTube to watch a trailer for an upcoming movie THAT IS THE AD. I don’t need a different ad (and definitely not 2-3) first. Get your money from the corpos putting the trailer up.

        The Marvel movie Thunderbolts has 4 main trailers on YouTube right now. Those have 9.6, 14, 15, and 21 million views. Marvel/Disney should be paying YouTube for 60m ad impressions. The fee shouldn’t be taken out of my free time.

    • Rin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Mfs will try to turn my phone into an electronic billboard.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      They don’t even need Gemini for this… They are just shoving into everyones face. I am sure data they have on people was watching the video is all they need and doesn’t take “ai” to figure it out.

    • Psychadelligoat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Gemini is actually legit the best LLM I’ve used locally for anything, consistently faster and more accurate than even models taking up about double the resources

      Shame it’s stupid locked down even in my ollama installation and it’s near impossible to get it to do something daddy google doesn’t like. Ah well, works really well for checking my garbage config files lol

      • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Long as you like it, let it run. Its only gotten in my way by forcing tabs into my browser and asking if I want to converse with it in my messages app

  • peanuts4life@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Once they finally lock down the player so it’s impossible to block or skip ads, I look forward to coding a script which screen records each video on my sub list, feeds each video with ads into a purpose made classifier model which labels the ads, stitches out of ads with FFmpeg, and then uploads them to my jellyfin server.

    • MrLLM@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      classifier model which labels the ads

      Not exactly my idea, I read about it somewhere when news about YT supposedly serving server-side ads started to spread.

      You could record the video several times and check for differences between streams and then cut them off, might be more resource intensive in network and storage, but I think it’s still cheaper than a neural network hogging the GPU.

    • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I really wanted to make a system that would recognize if it’s seen the same 30-second clip before (since ads are always repeats) by a shared signature that would just play something else or silence for the length of the ad on the client side, especially for live sports streams.

        • Showroom7561@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          “Netflix members pay as much attention to midroll ads as they do to the shows and movies themselves,” Amy Reinhard, president of advertising at Netflix, said, according to the publication.

          This is so hilarious when you think about it.

          Are their movies and shows so bad that people are watching ads with as much attention?

          Or do they mean “pay as much attention” by ignoring the content altogether as they only run Netflix as background noise while they do something else?

          😂

        • nullroot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Fwiw I kinda wanna see what awful slop their generative ai ads will be. Literally the first time in years I’ve been mildly interested to see an ad. Not that I’ll stop blocking ads to see them, but, mildly interested.

        • rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Yeah this would still hit 100% of ads that have happened before now. And all linear tv ads on streams. Seriously willing to build it if anyone wants to work on it with me. Pm me

  • Ulrich@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t understand why this needs AI. I’m guessing this is just more marketing nonsense. You can already see the “most engaged moments” by simply hovering over the timeline.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Google’s been deploying engagement models before anyone even knew the name OpenAI.

      This is oldschool machine learning, driven by viewing metrics from users. Gemini is just a brand.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        11 hours ago

        At some point you would think the investors would get upset about all the lying…

        • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          10 hours ago

          You know. I feel like its a bit obvious to say but a system where corporations are operated top-down by a group of individuals whose only interest is the profitability of said corporation with little to no consideration in other aspects of the corporation (the employees for one) is a pretty bad system. I remember reading that Henry Ford wanted to drop the price of the Model T to make it even more of an everyman car. Two of his top investors took him to court over it. This isn’t to say Ford was some sort of paragon; but it strikes me sometime, the degree to which the naked greed of some people pierces the capitalist veil of competitive innovation for social betterment.

          • sirdorius@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            This only strikes us plebes when we find out about it. It is common knowledge in economist circles:

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shareholder_primacy

            The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Profits: a company has no social responsibility to the public or society; its only responsibility is to its shareholders https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedman_doctrine

            This has only been recently challenged as a PR attempt to rebrand it into “stakeholder capitalism”

            Also, not related but equally horrifying: in macroeconomics there is a target of unemployment of around 5%, aka full employment is to be avoided: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NAIRU

          • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s worth noting that Dodge (yes, that Dodge) were the ones who took Ford to court over it. If you want the reason why shareholders come first, blame Dodge.

            • gwilikers@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              edit-2
              8 hours ago

              Riiight. Id like to learn more about Dodge; I’m gomna check if there’s a Ken Bursesque History of Dodge documentary.

              Edit: there is no such documentary.

              Edit 2: But there is a fairly decent one.

              Ford owed them dividends since they had shares from when they worked for him. And the Dodge Bros asked for these dividends but Ford basically already spent it on cutting wages, building factories, lower the price of cars, kissing puppies etc. All of which, as you may have noticed, is shit that investors (i.e. the Dodge Bros) hate in the short term, while, of course, expanding his business in the long term. Ford had a plan to buy them out, ya see. And, honestly, I can understand why they took him to court for that. Cuz he purposely made decisions that went against their interests as investors because they were his competitor. And the Dodge Bros, they’re not some pampered plutocrats, they came from a fairly impoverished backround - the details of which I won’t bore you with, as they are the same as every other rags to riches Americana. Though I do think its worth mentioning that they were not initially accepted among the social elite as they would drink beers and roughhouse with the men.¹

              All of this is very interesting, but it kind of muddies the water in terms of serving as an example of greedy investors forcing the corporate hand. But what if the hand that guides the corporate hand is not the investors’ but the invisible hand of the market?² And the Dodge Bros and Ford are just puppets to the invisible hand³ as it guides them along with a relationship to the wellbeing of actual humans⁴ that could be characterised as arbitrary at best and malicious at worst. Maybe that’s the lesson here.

              That and that Henry Ford is a scary motherfucker.

              1. Which is, I suppose, another rags to riches Americana story, but its one that’s pretty charming, a kind of, still one of the boys attitude, a dream that you can become wealthy and not be innately corrupted by that wealth. Like the Dodge Bros eventually were.

              2. Which, looking at it now, I appreciate is a contrived metaphor, but it sounded good in my head.

              3. The invisible hand is doing one of those Godfather cover art pupeteer with strings and shit. They’re not sock puppets. I did consider making a fist-of-capitalism-up-your-ass joke here but it sidetracks the issue a bit, and its a bit sexist/kink shamey.

              4. And plants and trees and animals.

        • dustyData@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Doesn’t matter because they get a cut every time they let their friends lie to the board. Executives get a cut every time they seem like they’re approving something. No one is personally liable for the lie. And those selling the lie get bonuses on every contract until they can sell the company to the next bag holder. It’s all imaginary power plays to funnel money.

    • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      That only works after the video is out and has usage statistics.

      This could theoretically start to identify those moments before the video is public.

    • half coffee@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I mean… an “if” statement is technically AI, so investors can see the buzz word and all Google has to code is “if most engaged moment, then play ad” lol

      • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        conditional and logical expressions have been the foundation of computing since the very beginning. you are using a definition of “AI” that is completely divorced from that history.

        • Fiery@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It’s a computer (Artificial) making a choice that is better than random (Intelligence)

          What it is not is a LLM (aka chatbot). It isn’t even any type of neural network. Does not make it any less AI though

          • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            No, it’s a computer making a computation. The programmer is the one using intelligence by choosing the appropriate computation for the situation at hand.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            It’s a computer (Artificial) making a choice that is better than random (Intelligence)

            That’s not what AI is, that’s just programming. AI implies the software was trained on a dataset in order to make pseudo-decisions on its own about the best way to do things.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They already do it in Podcasts and it is usually extremely ham-fisted. The presenter will be mid sentence talking about something and suddenly IMPROVE YOUR DIET WITH FACTOR

  • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Google seems bound and determined to destroy itself trying to escalate it’s profits from “staggering” to “colossal.” The search is so bad AI is actually better, and that’s saying something. And now they want to enshittify YouTube? Okay. I’m sure it won’t die right away, but this will be one of the thousands cuts.

      • podperson@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yep - I legit haven’t seen an ad on YT in years. I also, just the other day, ran across another filter that disables the stupid shorts since I don’t care for that format or YT pushing it on me all the time. Almost usable platform now.

          • cattywampas@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            37
            ·
            11 hours ago

            I just pay for premium. Worth every penny with the amount of YouTube we watch.

            • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Thank you for giving Google money.

              With your endearing support, Google is paying less attention to us so we can continue getting the same content for free.

              • cattywampas@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                9
                ·
                7 hours ago

                No problem, I like supporting all the neat content creators I follow while others are happy to rip them off because they feel entitled to free content.

                And don’t give me the “support them on patreon” line because a) I already do and b) ain’t no way the majority of you who pirate YouTube are donating money to everyone you follow.

                • Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  I donate to the top percentile of those I follow, at least.

                  RedLetterMedia ain’t getting ad revenue. They curse too much and Mike is an alcoholic.

                  but to put it plainly, I’m morally bankrupt on victimless crime and I know they’re taken care of.

                  again, thank you.

            • Retro_unlimited@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              If you pay premium, then you have to be logged in and tracked and spied on, even more data get sold. You pay them to sell your data!

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Plus the first-party app is atrocious. The third party ones are way better.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Last I checked Alphabet had something like $60 billion in profit.

        At this point, they probably consider YouTube to be a loss leader while they siphon up everyone’s data.

          • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Yes, I know, but I doubt 8.6 billions per quarter aren’t enough to make a profit.

            • Nougat@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              17
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              12 hours ago

              They haven’t stated their operating costs, so you’re only speculating.

              • MudMan@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Operating costs are not known with that granularity, to my knowledge, but it’s a good guess. Best anybody can tell Youtube is 10-ish percent of all of Alphabet’s ad revenue and they have a subscription model as well. Not to mention the data gathering for AI training, plus all the intangible benefits from owning all the video on the Internet, from using Youtube tech for Google Drive stored videos to… you know, owning all the video on the Internet. And all of that without investing the ungodly amount of money Netflix and the other streaming competitors do on content. People just… upload that crap.

                However their internal accounting breaks down, I’m pretty sure nobody thinks Youtube is bleeding money.

                • dustyData@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 hours ago

                  YouTube was almost bankrupted because the cost of storage, servers and bandwidth greatly overran the ad revenue. Every idiot with 2 subscribers uploading dozens of hours of content cost them a ton of money. It is easy to underestimate how expensive video streaming infrastructure is.

              • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Yes, if you re-read my previous comment I said I don’t think they are losing money.

            • cygnus@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Facebook has spent something like 70 billion dollars on the “metaverse” with nothing to show for it, so it’s very possible.