If anyone is wondering how: it’s roughly akin to rotating a photo and rotating it back (on a non 90° shift) - the input pixels get moved around with some interpolation.
Using the spray tool isn’t much better. I’ve sent people PMs of their de-censored faces to show them how leaving 50% of pixels untouched is plenty of information.
I think a child porn distributor tried to hide his face using that swirl tool. And he found out that Photoshop will unswirl it quite happily.
That’s good until you realize that it’s a very bad sign that Photoshop is now capable of happiness 😬🤔
It steals the happiness from everyone who is forced to use it.
Unlike GIMP that beats the happiness out of you
The beatings will continue until gimp is updated to GTK4.
Sentient Photoshop sounds like bad news 😬
Very.
You think you child porn distributor?
Haha, fixed now. Thanks.
If anyone is wondering how: it’s roughly akin to rotating a photo and rotating it back (on a non 90° shift) - the input pixels get moved around with some interpolation.
Yeah, it was just reversed.
If anyone wants to seriously sensor an image, it has to be a destructive edit where pixels are removed, not transformed.
Mr. Swirl Face. I would link to his Wikipedia entry, but his Wikipedia entry DOESN’T SHOW WHAT EVERYONE WANTS TO SEE.
So just search the name.
Using the spray tool isn’t much better. I’ve sent people PMs of their de-censored faces to show them how leaving 50% of pixels untouched is plenty of information.