• bonenode@piefed.socialEnglish
      2 months

      I think the funniest part isn’t even the addition of humongous knockers but that the face doesn’t even remotely look like the original photo.

      • Railcar8095@lemmy.world
        2 months

        Somebody uploaded a photo of me with my baby to make an animated Christmas greeting. After the first frame the baby’s face turned into an unrecognizable generic baby face.

  • mkwt@lemmy.world
    2 months

    I think a child porn distributor tried to hide his face using that swirl tool. And he found out that Photoshop will unswirl it quite happily.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      2 months

      That’s good until you realize that it’s a very bad sign that Photoshop is now capable of happiness 😬🤔

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      2 months

      If anyone is wondering how: it’s roughly akin to rotating a photo and rotating it back (on a non 90° shift) - the input pixels get moved around with some interpolation.

    • Zomg@piefed.worldEnglish
      2 months

      Yeah, it was just reversed.

      If anyone wants to seriously sensor an image, it has to be a destructive edit where pixels are removed, not transformed.

    • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
      2 months

      Using the spray tool isn’t much better. I’ve sent people PMs of their de-censored faces to show them how leaving 50% of pixels untouched is plenty of information.

    • Dem Bosain@midwest.socialEnglish
      2 months

      Mr. Swirl Face. I would link to his Wikipedia entry, but his Wikipedia entry DOESN’T SHOW WHAT EVERYONE WANTS TO SEE.

      So just search the name.

  • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    2 months

    I remember seeing this in some subreddit, and a bunch of brainrotted AIddicts were too busy spouting “here’s a way more realistic version from Gemini” to read the room and figure out that they were being made fun of