• entwine413@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m not sure they can in this instance. The reason they could sue the Switch emulator team was because they were using a proprietary encryption key.

      I don’t think the NES had that, and as long as you own the game, emulation is legal.

      Also, this might be considered transformative use since the devs have to create the 3D profile by hand.

      • glitchdx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nintendo was able to sue palworld using a patent that didn’t exist before palworlds release. It’s not right, but they can do whatever they want regardless of what the law says.

        • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Exhibit number 4,923,768 for why patents should not exist and need to be aggressively banished from civilization.

        • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          They were able to do that because Palworld is made by Japanese devs, and they used specifically Japanese patent law. Doesn’t apply here.

        • entwine413@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s not the lawsuit that’s being discussed. It’s the Yuzu Switch emulator lawsuit.

          • glitchdx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            yeah, i know. Point is that Nintendo can do whatever they want with the flimsyest excuse.

      • callouscomic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        as long as you own the game, emulation is legal.

        People say this, but I believe it is mostly technically untrue. It’d be a relatively easy argument to say that a downloaded ROM that isn’t exactly the digital copy YOU purchased with a license would be seen as not legal.

        However some people talk about literally ripping the game off the physical device themselves, hence copying their own copy of it. Now you are in grey territory of making copies of copyrighted materials, and in the case of more modern games like the last decade, they almost assuredly have language that specifies you don’t actually own the code and all that.

        All I’m saying is be careful and probably refrain from repeating the fallacy that owning a game makes emulation of it legal, because that implies having the ROM is legal and that’s doubtful.

  • Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Zelda 1 seems an odd omission from the supported games. I wonder if some games are harder to implement than others or something.

  • LCP@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bought it a few years ago. Super cool, though I probably only messed around with it a couple hours before forgetting about it.

  • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    It also works with romhacks if the code isn’t changed too much. Ducktales 2 co-op works like a charm!

  • Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I just gave it a download. Tested Mega Man 2, and now I’m playing Super Mario Bros. It’s really fucking cool