• darcmage@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 months ago

    MC: It’s not us.

    Steam & Itch: It’s the payment processors.

    Gee, I wonder who people are going to believe.

    • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They are both telling the truth, which is how the best lies work.

      Mastercard: “It’s all good as long as it is legal”.

      Religious zealots: “Games depict sex with children!!!”

      Steam/Itch: “Which games?”

      Zealots: “Yes”

      Mastercard: “Sex with children is illegal. Get rid of those games.”

      Steam/Itch: “Which games???”

      Mastercard: “That’s a you problem. Figure it out and get rid of them or lose the ability to process payments.”

      Steam/Itch: *pulls most NSFW games while they figure out “which games”

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wouldn’t it be nice if the payment processors required more than being really annoying to get something classified as possibly illegal?

        • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          The United States is a VERY litigious country. The biggest motivator in America is profit, and the possibility of lawsuits is contrary to profit. Fucking over indie devs selling niche games that makes a few bucks on Steam is a lot cheaper than the legal expenses of a lawsuit and the bad press of “Mastercard funds child pornography”.

          It isn’t about fairness. It’s about profit.

          • gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Kind of off topic, but this just activated one of my trap card rants,

            The problem is not that we’re a litigious society, the problem is we make litigation artificially costly and time consuming by restricting the number of lawyers and judges we create and only trying to address the bottleneck that creates by making courts harder to access (e.g. increasing filing fees, giving defendants more ability to force things into arbitration kangaroo courts, etc.).

            Especially in light of how our courts have been just making up bullshit to let cops/soldiers/Republicans do whatever the fuck they since circa 1968/2001/2025, you can’t tell me that people need as many years of education to practice law as we require in this country.

            Also, private bar associations are fucking weird, feudal era anti-democratic bullshit that ought to get replaced with proper public licensing agencies that are accountable to democratic systems and accessible to the public

            /end rant

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Thing is…I think both claims are correct.

      Mastercard and Visa are not the only middle-men; the only “payment processors” involved in making sales.

      Next time you check out at a cafe, look at the branding of the tablet/software the cashier is using. Chances are, it wasn’t developed by the cafe owners, or by MC/Visa. That’s a payment processor. There’s some big ones out there that can be hard to avoid.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Practically no one in the world who accepts payments for their online business directly integrates with visa or Mastercard. It’s all 3rd party companies who integrate (because it’s fucking hard and tedious) and then resell it in a nice easy package.

        In almost all cases, any talk about payment processors, is them, not visa/Mastercard.

      • commander@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I remember seeing a graphic that was about every layer of companies that are interacted with when you use a credit card. Must have been at least like 6 layers of companies each taking a fee from a company that took fees higher up the chain closer to the consumer. Similar when I read an explanation of, when you buy a stock through a company like Fidelity where is the stock actually held and that was layers of public/private companies/corporations

      • justOnePersistentKbinPlease@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        All of those devices are child companies of either Banks or Credit Card companies. Or, like Square, owe their continued existence to banking and wall st firms dumping cash on them.

        The one outlier I know about is Canada’s Interac system, which was started by Canadian banks, but now is its own thing

    • vodka@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      From what I understand it wasn’t actually mastercard and visa?

      Itch statements made it very clear the issue was PayPal and Stripe.

      Steam even disabled PayPal payments for a while, a couple days before the purge. While direct card payments with Visa/Mastercard still worked fine.

    • paraphrand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Well, everyone discussing this seems to have been confused about it. Is it fucking PayPal and Stripe or fucking Mastercard and Visa?

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s been pretty widely reported that it’s PayPal and Stripe(mostly Stripe) that have been the ones that were requiring them to remove the NSFW material.