Twice in the past fews days, I’ve gotten a reply from a Mastodon user complaining that I should have put the direct link to an article.

  • On Lemmy I posted the direct link to the article as usual
  • On their Mastodon feed, I appear as a Mastodon user that posted a link to a Lemmy thread

It seems that threadiverse posts are being seen by more mastodon users now, which is great, but maybe the formatting could use some improvements?

Example 1:

Example 2:

I know Mastodon got “quote posts” recently, is that related to this change?

Is Mastodon also getting a “group” view? That might be the best solution to the problem

  • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    If it has a summary, I will use that as the content

    But isn’t that how Mastodon handles content warnings? Baffling that they’d do it like that frankly given that it prevents long-form content (when masto actually starts supporting that) from being CW’d.

    • julian@activitypub.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not necessarily, no. Content warnings were implemented in Mastodon specifically as summary plus sensitive=true. Perhaps not originally, but that is enforced now (all CW’d posts from Mastodon are marked sensitive). Might be Mastodon will CW notes that don’t have sensitive, out of caution, but this doesn’t apply to non-Notes.

      So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.

      • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.

        I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW’d, as the summery is used as the post’s content.

        • julian@activitypub.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 days ago

          I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add as:sensitive to mark the status as CW’d? I don’t think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.

          • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            7 days ago

            Masto interprets a Note set as as:sensitive without a summary to mean ‘blur any media attached, but don’t collapse the text content’. I believe the same is true for non-Notes, but obviously without the summary = CW logic.