• Prathas@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      No, ADB will still allow installation of anonymous apps. All this hullabaloo is talking about non-ADB installation.

      • DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        He’s not wrong in a way. If ADB is overwhelmingly used and “undesirable” apps (vanced and “streaming apps”) don’t see any drop in support or usage, or if governments see a massive number using this to fly under the surveillance radar, they’ll restrict ADB too…

        Likely they’ll pull what Meta did and make everyone who wants to enable “developer mode” will actually need to prove they are indeed, a developer.

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          45 minutes ago

          Well, I’m not a dev and did that just for SideQuest access, so it’s easy enough… but yeah, for those wishing (near-)total anonymity, I see what you mean…

      • DanVctr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Oh word? I feel slightly better then. Still going to make it more of a pain to install ad block on my parents new devices

        • Prathas@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          46 minutes ago

          Right, so the issue is how many devs will stay motivated to keep developing knowing that staying unregistered may significantly reduce users’ draw…