• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I appreciate your cynicism, but I’m not personally inclined towards it. I think what it will ultimately boil down to, which you alluded to, is how the law is enforced. If they get fined as a first measure but then get taken to court for a second failure by California’s attorney general and get subsequently bankrupted, it might stand as an example to others.

    Or maybe they’ll still say the potential risk is still worth it. I dunno. We’ll just have to see how this goes, but it’s still better than the current options, which are:

    • Trying to navigate deleting your own data, staying on top of it, and hoping they’re actually deleting things.
    • Paying a private company to do it and hope they’re not just pocketing your money.
    • Doing nothing and getting butt-fucked by surveillance capitalism.

    None of those are great, so I’m hopeful this is the start of something better.

    • chillpanzee@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Earlier in the year I read an article claiming that something like 40% of the data brokers doing business here (ie collecting data on California citizens) don’t comply with elements of existing law, such as registering with the CA secretary of state. So the author wasn’t bullish on the idea that they’d suddenly start just because there’s a new law. They are sayign the AG will aggressively pursue violators, but we’ll see.

      If nothing else, we’ll have one more data store to get hacked.