AI is asbestos in the walls of our tech society, stuffed there by monopolists run amok. A serious fight against it must strike at its roots

    • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Unfortunately most of the GPUs aren’t usable by gamers. We aren’t talking mining booms where miners buy up gaming GPU stock, then sell cheap when the bubble bursts.

      We’re talking companies buying huge GPUs that don’t have video outputs and have an altered software stack to what’s used for gaming.

      Granted, many 4090/5090s were also used, and those will be usable by gamers, but even with a significant price drop on those, only richer gamers will find that to be viable.

      Somewhat similar story for memory - a lot of it is tied up in HBM, or as GDDR on enterprise graphics cards.

      • melfie@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I certainly wouldn’t let something like a cheap RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server with 96GB of VRAM go to waste. I’d put it to good use with Blender rendering, running models I actually care about, and maybe some Games on Whales.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    most of these companies will probably fail. it’s expected. but the AI paradigm is not going anywhere

  • wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    AI is in the hype section of the emerging technology curve. A lot of good will come out of AI once we calm down and stop losing our damn minds.

    It won’t be just cheap GPUs either. It will be things like more accurate cancer diagnoses, as Cory says near the top.

    What we need is for regulation to catch up and start incentivizing the right things…that is, the things that will benefit society as a whole, not just the oligarchs.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      not “our” minds. theirs.

      techbros are the ones causing it to the detriment of everyone else.

    • RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Most of the hype isn’t about machine learning stuff for cancer diagnoses though. When the average C-level guy talks about AI they mean almost exclusively LLMs. Fancy autocomplete is their solution to everything, from summarizing an email to agentic OSes. And that’s just not going to happen.

    • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      That won’t happen until the brick wall is not only hit, but completely demolished. While Democrats are significantly more rational than Republicans, they are still almost as much in the oligarchs’ collective pockets. Only the Progressives give me any hope, but there aren’t nearly enough of them in Congress yet to make shit happen.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It is already happening.

        The distractions is that you only see the AI companies which have been blitz scaling, dumping unlimited amounts of money into orders and plans without any revenue plans for the other side. This move only pays off if they can essentially buy the entire market and lock out any competition (and then the rent-seeking enshittification will being). The long-term prospects of these companies is shaky at best, but that doesn’t matter to the people currently dumping funding into them… they’re going to sell everything at the IPO and leave some other suckers with the bag.

        Because of this, there are many many times the amount of advertising and promotional hype than is justified by the actual progress in the field.

        Everyone is familiar with this. If someone says AI, do you think of ChatGPT or an LLM? That’s because you’ve been affected by this hype wave that is being intentionally propagated in order to drive valuations for AI companies who are looking to hit an IPO so all of the early investors can get out quick before the bubble bursts (It’s like a crypto rugpull, except it is using the stock market instead of a meme coin).

        ‘Actual’ AI. By which I mean machine learning, including neural networks, has made huge progress in a lot of fields following the discovery of the Transformer model (the T in GPT). The, very real and impressive, improvements that have been gained are not flashy, they do not make for immediate next-quarter profits and are mostly public discoveries coming out of academia so they benefit everyone which makes them worthless to the people trying to horde emerging technology in order to push this bubble/rugpull.

        Your life will be WAY more affected by the slow and incremental work being done in the field of robotics than having a slightly more personable chatbot. Your life or the lives of people you love will be saved by the advances in protein folding which allow rapid development of new treatments which can be customized to the individual. Cancer therapies that are optimized for the exact mutations in the patient’s cancer cells or customized medicine aimed at reducing side effects or harmful interactions.

        • SanctimoniousApe@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I was already aware of much of what you said, although I probably hadn’t gazed down the road quite as far.

          However, what I was referring to was the regulation the commenter I replied to was calling for. What I meant was that proper legislation wouldn’t happen until the “rugpull” you described actually happens, and the economy finally goes into the recession it would otherwise already be deep into at this point. Being delayed so long may make it especially ugly, I fear - or it may just bridge us into the next thing that keeps the economy propped up, such as the robotics you mentioned.

          May you live in interesting times, indeed.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    10 hours ago

    “Reverse centaur” is a super clunky term, I think we should say “Minotaur” instead.

    A Centaur has the head of a person and the body of a beast, a Minotaur is the opposite.

    • kalkulat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Pretty sure a superb writer like Cory chose reverse centaur for a reason - to make it clearer that a human is becoming the servant of a machine.

    • pepeSilvia@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      The term isn’t just about which half is human though, it’s about the dynamic flip in humans relationship with tooling.

      The “tool” part of the centaur is the horse body. All of the hard to duplicate bits of a human (reasoning, processing, fine motor skills) with the strength and speed of a horse. A reverse centaur is when a complex system is designed that needs a “dumb human” to do the complex bits while the system uses humans as an appendage.

      Reverse centaur may sound clunky but is a really elegant one liner for Doctorow’s thesis.

    • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Minotaurs have some potential for badass imagery. Reverse Centaur sounds intentionally clunky.

  • Zephorah@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Wow. I feel like I just entered a Time Machine back to the 90s and 00s. I didn’t realize Corey Doctorow was still writing blog stuff on other venues.

      • Die4Ever@retrolemmy.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Hopefully we have ways to recycle the old chips. Some of the GPU chips could maybe be put on consumer boards? I’ve already heard of memory chips being recycled, except HBM of course.

        Of course a lot of these companies would probably just prefer to put them in a trash compactor lol.

        • balsoft@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I’m not sure it’s targeted at anyone “important” (what a classist term!). It is just analyzing the situation and predicting what happens next, for you and I to be prepared. It also hastens the end of the bubble ever so slightly, which is good - the sooner this poison-laced bandaid is ripped off the world’s economy, the faster we can start to rebuild something more meaningful, but now with new productivity tools by our side.

        • kalkulat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          nobody important cares

          And you’re sure of that because …

          In most fairy tales, it takes more than one blow to kill the dragon…

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This man has really built a career and following off saying common sense things…

    I don’t know why people keep eating it up or acting like he’s a genius, but at least this time he isn’t coining a new term to “explain” something that leads to everyone using it but not understanding what’s actually happening.

    • balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I don’t think he’s necessarily a genius, but he is a force for good and a great writer. We do need someone to keep stating the truth, keep saying what’s right and what’s wrong, this is literally how we win the information war currently waged against us.

      It’s the same with the genocide experts calling out genocide, or the eco-activists calling out climate change. It might be obvious common sense to you, but it might not be to other people, and this is precisely why it needs to be shouted from every rooftop we have available.

      Oh, and also, if you actually read his works he clearly does more than just state the obvious and coin new terms (even though both of those are important too). He is deeply and intimately familiar with the technical and social structures of the modern internet, his analysis of various phenomena and trends is usually on-point and has some predictive power (it is more dialectical-materialist than most tech journalism out there). Most importantly he offers solutions to the issues facing us, and practices what he preaches too.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        He is deeply and intimately familiar with the technical and social structures of the modern internet, his analysis of various phenomena and trends is usually on-point and has some predictive power

        If you think he predicts anything, you’re streets behind

        Most importantly he offers solutions to the issues facing us

        He repeats what anyone could find in a five minute Google search from articles written by others.

        I’ve never seen an original thought, he’s the Carlos Mencia of tech.

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      What you might think is “common sense” may not be for others. There is value in this being documented, otherwise the person without “common sense” may be influenced by someone with an agenda who does document their thoughts.

      Same as when people make fun of “obvious” research, there is value in having it peer reviewed as a reference for future researchers.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        8 hours ago

        There is value in this being documented, otherwise the person without “common sense” may be influenced by someone with an agenda who does document their thoughts.

        Oh yeah, because no one has “documented” that AI is bullshit yet…

        Only the brave Cory Doctrow could gather and disseminate this to the masses!

        /s

        • protist@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The fuck’s with your beef? This is just one article he wrote. The guys written hundreds of pieces, maybe thousands, about all sorts of technology related issues

    • baggachipz@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      12 hours ago

      He’s a good writer and leader on the technology front. He gets a bit repetitive but that’s because he is trying to get the word out.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      He’s actually built a career on being an author…

      I’m also assuming you only read the headline

    • ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Timing. Saying common sense stuff before others gives you an edge and being the first to say it with any eloquence, in a way people want to listen and are accepting of what’s being said. A lot of what Cory Doctorow says can be hard to hear or hard to deliver without sounding condescending like NDT. His talent is in the delivery.

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        He also has a ton of experience in this space, he’s worked for the Electronic Frontier Foundation for almost 25 years. On top of that, he’s whip-smart and enjoyable to read or listen to

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        Saying common sense stuff before others

        Yeah bro…

        No one else has pointed out AI will fail before 1/18/26…

        Only the great Cory Doctrow could identify something that no other human has ever even contemplated.

        I heard next, he’s going to release a blog post that Nazis might not be nice people