People always misuse searchengines by writing the whole questions as a search…

With ai they still can do that and get, i think in their optinion, a better result

  • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Eh? You can ask it to provide sources and it will. Or at least Google AI in the search box does it by default

    There’s lots of things wrong with AI, but that’s actually not one of them much of the time.

    • Infrapink@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 days ago

      There is no guarantee those sources say what the answer says, or indeed that they actually exist. Generators can and do assemble words into phrases that look like citations, but those sources don’t exist. It’s actually a problem for librarians, who keep getting accused of hiding nonexistent books “cited” by ChatGPT

      Or in comic form:

      ![A comic in four panels and one insert by Davide Ravoy:

      Panel 1. While walking on a swamp, a young Gothic Sorceress and her AI cyber parrot flying behind her, meets a little lonely frog on the leaves of waterlilies. The Gothic sorcereress walks with confidence.

      AI Parrot: Frog identified. Based on my analysis, I think you should kiss it.
      Gothic Sorceress: Ugh! No way Avian Intelligence, and leave me alone.
      

      Panel 2. Shot on the AI Parrot, explaining, the Gothic sorceress turn back, emitting doubt about what the AI bird says.

      AI Parrot: I insist, my sources indicate a high probability of a cursed prince.
      Gothic Sorceress: Your sources?!
      

      Panel 3. Shot on the AI Parrot, hallucinating a list of sources. The Gothic sorcerer considers the list.

      AI Parrot: Sources:
      
          "The Princess's Pocket Guide"
          Padwick L. (1420), page 45-52, Enchanted Press.
          "Unmasking the Prince Within"
          Croak, O. (1417), page 25, Royal Publishing.
          "Basic Curse Lifting"
          O.Rly, (1412). chapter 42, Arcane Editions.
          "Leap of Faith"
          Frogsworth B.S. (1368). Mystic Publishing.
      

      Insert panel: The Gothic Sorceress kisses the frog, who blushes:

      soundFx: "Smack!"
      

      Panel 4. The frog is still a frog. The Gothic Sorceress spits in disgust. The frog continues to blush.

      Gothic Sorceress: Pwah! Fake sources! Lies! All of it!
      Frog: ♥](https://media.thebrainbin.org/e2/4f/e24f8760a24fd483616a50a6241af1a11915208bcee0c5cf57357980486e9781.jpg)
      
      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh you definitely have to double check. But what’s the point of sources if you don’t check them anyway?

        And links in particular are super easy to check. Books and articles obviously less so

    • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Oh interesting. It should do this by default then.

      Defaults matter. They normalize patterns of behaviour. People who are normalized not to care about citations are being trained to blindly accept whatever they’re told. That’s a recipe for an unthinking, obedient, submissive society.

        • chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Oh this has been going on for centuries. Technology is always changing and so is culture! I think it’s usually the case that technology changes first and culture takes a while to catch up.

      • pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Oh interesting. It should do this by default then.

        Yes. And I find it interesting that every online AI I have encountered hides it’s work, while the open source locally hosted versions default to showing their work.

        I’m not sure I have a grasp on the various motivations in play, but it doesn’t feel nice that the ones available to the average user behave so differently.

    • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes and no. It sometimes kind of tries to extrapolate from lots of sources and just gives you a few of them that don’t really give an answer.