So, I work hard, my ass off, 5 days a week, 11 months a year, and I pay 1/3 or 1/4th of it so that pidophiles dont pay taxes.
Income tax, VAT, property selling tax are all theft. There is no logic behind it.
The taxes that should exist is: Wealth tax, nature tax for the businesses that damage nature, and that is it. And no tax should be over 5%.
Wealth tax: 0%, income tax: 30% this is unacceptable. You either pay no taxes or you pay everything as tax.

I actually calculated it, and yearly 2.5% of wealth tax should be enough. And also, countries have a lot of resources, that also can help their budget, like mines or rented lands that are owned by government etc.

If we taxed wealth, not work, we could buy our houses way easier, we could buy land way easier, we could find a job way easier because we are not gonna pay income and vat, businesses will be able to hire people freely, and everybody can own a business easily. Nowadays, if you are poor it is so hard to create a business. You have a lot of expenses.

  • sahin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Wealth control means giving them the wealth, and not owning by the government. Because when the government owns everything, that means the people in government become rich.
    Why does, not taxing moving money end public funding? Okay, it can be 2%, and this is enough.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Why does, not taxing moving money end public funding

      Because eventually everyone is below the “wealth cap”. Which means no-one pays any further tax. Why would anyone accrue more wealth at that point?

      Okay, it can be 2%, and this is enough.

      If we’re taxing all transactions, then yes, sounds about right.

      Because when the government owns everything, that means the people in government become rich.

      Are you suggesting we privatize everything?

      Wealth control means giving them the wealth, and not owning by the government.

      Ok, but how do decisions get made then?

      Government are systems. Just because you change the structure, doesn’t make it not a government. It sounds like you want better government, not “no government”.

      Which I agree with.

      • sahin@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thanks dude, I think we agreed in a lot of ways and some disagreements may happen, no need for further discussions.