The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records.

The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

Archive: http://archive.today/gfTg9

  • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Android phones have lockdown mode too. Hold the power button to show the shutdown menu and click lockdown.

    phone screenshot

    • BanMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      They’re not the same. Android lockdown is a temporary lock screen state. iOS lockdown is a full OS hardening, affects the way the phone operates full-time.

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Having it and it working as well are two different things. historically Apple has been ahead in security that can slow down or stop law enforcement. And before before you jump to the same conclusions as someone else, I never have owned an iPhone, nor wanted to.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        That’s incorrect. Google’s Android has several industry leading security features the iPhone doesn’t support.

          • roofuskit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            There’s a lot of copium in this thread. Joke is I’ve been pretty hardcore Android since day one, I have never owned an iPhone. I am just capable of some level of objectivity. Shit, there’s podcasts out there from early in the Android v iOS days where I was the token Android guy defending it as the IBM compatible equivalent of its day. Telling these hard core iPhone guys that Apple would lose the market share fight worldwide because of the closed nature, the same way they lost it on the desktop. But yeah, there’s people here denouncing me as an Apple fanboy because I was capable of complimenting a strength it has.

            • Analog@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Keep doing it. They all have strengths and suckiness at the same time.