• felixwhynot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    It’s problematic imho bc the “advice” is often incomplete, without context, or wrong. So you end up having to verify it yourself anyway. But if you don’t then you could have harmful advice.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Which to be fair is not any different from a lawyer. They’re not perfect either.

      The difference is that a lawyer can be held responsible for malpractice. When a chatbot gives harmful advice, who is responsible?

      (Obviously, whoever is running it, but so far that hasn’t been established in court.)