- AA5B@lemmy.worldEnglish20 minutes
My NetGear router still has a uselessly incomplete implementation of VLANs after 5+ years of updates, I was ready to replace it out of frustration. Gen 6 wireless is getting old hat anyway
- VoodooAardvark@lemmy.zipEnglish14 hours
Control of the routers
Control of online identity
What could go wrong?
- TransNeko@lemmy.worldEnglish13 hours
It could be worse… we could be living the alternate watchdogs legion timeline… where Albion wins.
Cherry@piefed.socialEnglish
14 hoursAnd looks like netgear is off my list of trustworthiness. Used them for 20 years. Best get looking for a new one.
- Atropos@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
Mikrotik just released a new overkill router with wifi7 and 2.5G Ethernet. Might pick one of those up in order to avoid the inevitable fuckery for the next few years.
- sakphul@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish13 hours
Still need to wait for more details on what Netgear agreed on with the FCC to get the conditional approval. Otherwise it is hard to evaluate if this is a good or bad thing.
- halcyoncmdr@piefed.socialEnglish20 hours
So you now can be absolutely certain that Netgear is actively and openly giving fascist authoritarians what they want.
At least before you could be fairly certain it was just the secretive three letter guys that roughly knew what they were doing at least. Now it’s even the blatant dumb fucks in charge.
nbailey@lemmy.caEnglish
17 hoursThe cool thing is that you can make basically any combination of parts into a router if you install Linux or BSD on it. Not terribly helpful for end user consumers that will get shafted by this, but at the end of the day it’s just a small computer.
Otherwise, smuggle some “foreign routers” in from Mexico or Canada like it’s the prohibition era?
- stumu415@lemmy.zipEnglish19 hours
Definitely will have no backdoor or monitoring installed as default.
- floofloof@lemmy.caEnglish20 hours
It’s not clear what makes Netgear’s currently foreign-made routers safer than, say, an Amazon Eero 7 or a Google Nest WiFi Pro.
This is all evidence that it’s not really about safety. It’s a clumsy attempt to strongarm tech companies into setting up factories in the USA. It may also be an attempt to create an environment in which it’s easier to install US government backdoors on every home router.
- Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
It’s a clumsy attempt to strongarm tech companies into setting up factories in the USA
Evidently not since Netgear has zero factories in the USA and plans to bring zero factories to the USA in the future.
It may also be an attempt to create an environment in which it’s easier to install US government backdoors on every home router.
It’s this one.
MintyFresh@lemmy.worldEnglish
3 hoursAs well as a clumsy attempt to thwart foreign back doors. Unless they’ve paid for them. Or are Israel.
- msage@programming.devEnglish14 hours
But how hilarious it is that Google and Amazon, already bending the knee to the emperor, did not get a pass.
- 19 hours
TrendNet is far superior and based on Torrence anyway. Netgear and Linksys are junk anyway. Get yourself an open hardware platform, or something that can run OpenWRT. Skip the corporate manufacturers who all kind of suck.
- superglue@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish19 hours
I have 2 of them running openwrt, one is my main router. WiFi radio doesnt work though because of broadcom.
yardratianSoma@lemmy.caEnglish
17 hoursNot surprising . . . . .and this still does nothing to help domestic network device production in the US, since Netgear outsources their manufacturing to Taiwan.
- Zedstrian@sopuli.xyzEnglish20 hours
Sounds like a non-tariff barrier to trade that other countries should bring up in trade negotiations.
- sunbeam60@feddit.ukEnglish13 hours
The very same trade negotiations where all other countries have basically taken the stance that “we’ll just grin and bear it and wait for three years until he’s gone”. The EU is currently accepting 15% tariffs on their goods and mandating no tariffs in return.
Em Adespoton@lemmy.caEnglish20 hoursEr, there’s at least 5 consumer router manufacturers that meet the new requirements. Interestingly, one of them is TP-Link.
- felbane@lemmy.worldEnglish17 hours
Translation: they refused to allow us to inject telemetry into their firmware.








