- FarceOfWill@infosec.pubEnglish23 days
“Once again repeating the last thing he heard, elderly man now agrees with the ai industry”
- bookmeat@fedinsfw.appEnglish23 days
It’s about control. He wants to dictate the terms and regulations.
meejle@piefed.worldEnglish
23 daysYeah, I wouldn’t be surprised if they want to vet the models to make sure they say nice things about Trump.
- 23 days
Objectively untrue. He lacks the cognition to realize anything of the sort. “Mythos is so scary!!1!1” is a PR line.
PierceTheBubble@lemmy.mlEnglish
23 daysI’ll give it a year before this “voluntary” evaluation becomes mandatory, while standards based on industry-leading models, dictate guardrails impossible to implement for upcoming models. And thus giving reason to consider would-be competitors’ models a “national security risk”: evaluated by a board, which by then, is composed of “experts” with a vested interest in the leading industry…
Personally I believe AI models, using content for which they do not have the creator’s explicit permission, have no right to exist (at least as a commercially available product).
- SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.caEnglish23 days
AI safety testing under Trump is just another way to slow down competition for Musk’s xAI.
Elon is a boss at paying off government to slow down any competition.





