• YappyMonotheist@lemmy.world
    12 hours

    People here don’t know prudence and decorum, probably because they don’t have normal relationships with their families or even people in general. And it’s not social media, it’s the people themselves. I was a (very horny) child when Facebook came out and even I wasn’t doing all of that. 🤷

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      7 hours

      To know whether any act of prudence or decorum is a feather in one’s cap is first to answer to what end and on whose behalf.

      Examples:

      Both are often invoked in the context of potential loss to those who have the most to lose.

      Self preservation is prudent. Prudence avoids loss of face …of social standing …of strategic advantage, and so forth.

      Decorum avoids offending traditional sensibilities …protects what is sacred …retains political capital …maintains institutional legitimacy.

      So both tend to be elevated as lofty virtues by those with power and authority to lose.

      Anyway I used to think similarly. What disabused me of my regard for such ideals was living among those who prudence and decorum never served.

  • Sigilos@ttrpg.network
    18 hours

    I don’t see the issue. Her grandma is being loving and supportive, and it’s not like grandma doesn’t know what sex is.

  • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    23 hours

    Hot take, Google+ was onto something with their “circles” thing. Basically you could choose the visibility of every post and comment you made to be limited to a subset of your contacts

    • RamenJunkie@midwest.socialEnglish
      17 hours

      The core issue with Google+ wasn’t the platform, it was that Giogle started becoming a spyware comany and rewuired real IDs and forced thst shit on everyone.

      • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        23 hours

        Corporate social media is always destined to enshittification and being a tool of surveillance capitalism, being Google’s just speedran it.

    • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
      23 hours

      Facebook also allows this to an extent. Or at least it did 5 years ago when I last used facebook. You did have to manually choose who could see the post everytime though. Not nearly as convenient.

      • JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        23 hours

        Yeah It’d take forever to click “All like-minded hoes in the world EXCEPT family members”

      • MinnesotaGoddam@lemmy.world
        20 hours

        i had a friend who accidentally got his posts set to only post to me. and i would reliably comment on everything because we were besties. apparently it really got to his mental health.

    • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      22 hours

      Google+ started well enough, but when only google using nerds were the only ones using it using it( as it was designed by those people), they decided to make it worse and force it on everyone.

    • MadhuGururajan@programming.devEnglish
      23 hours

      I don’t recall, wasn’t google+ the new product to come out of orkut? Or was orkut bought out by google when google+ didn’t “perform as expected”

  • GraniteM@lemmy.world
    23 hours

    If you’re doing bendy sex positions and your partner farts and you can’t both have a laugh about it and continue with the bendy sex then your relationship needs an upgrade.