- Bomnam@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish42 minutes
As time goes on I’m hoping more products like this that give what was once only possible via locked down proprietary software a new open and repairable life as theres many new products and tech that I see but could never use unless I’d want to just upload everything I do to whoevers servers and pray that they don’t get breached.
- stringere@sh.itjust.worksEnglish14 minutes
https://www.opensourceecology.org/gvcs/
The Global Village Construction Set (GVCS) is a modular, DIY, low-cost, high-performance platform that allows for the easy fabrication of the 50 different Industrial Machines that it takes to build a small, sustainable civilization with modern comforts. We’re developing open source industrial machines that can be made at a fraction of commercial costs, and sharing our designs online for free.
- 4 hours
github
A user you’ve blocked has previously contributed to this repository.
look inside
claude
click insights
Top 3 committers is: some org account, another org account but with “.ai” in it, claudeEDIT: they are not only the top 3 committers, they are the only 3 committers
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldEnglish
45 minutesSo? The repository is empty did you even check it. There is no code in it at all.
- qwerty@discuss.tchncs.deEnglish2 hours
I don’t see that as a problem. A vacuum cleaner isn’t critical infrastructure and shouldn’t be connected to the internet, so no security concerns. Worst case scenario it ruins your carpet. Majority of the work here will be done on hardware side it seems.
- AbidanYre@lemmy.worldEnglish40 minutes
There’s 0 code thus far. What “code” does exist is all just readme.md for various ros modules. Getting upset about the guy using ai seems a little premature.
- BendingHawk@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
Thank you for saving me the time I would have wasted getting excited about this
SkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldEnglish
44 minutesWell there is nothing to be excited about, the entire repo is empty with only a bunch of readme files. Zero code has been written ai or not.
- Tja@programming.devEnglish2 hours
It’s open source. Feel free to write your own software, or pay someone to do it for you.
- Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish29 minutes
“Here is a beautiful piece of art. You say it’s just a blank piece of paper? Please feel free to draw your own art on it, and then it will be as I said.”
I know the real news here is the hardware, but it is still funny…
- JabbaTheThott@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
Don’t use any operating systems and most major websites then because theyre all using a coding agent now. It’s just the way the industry is going at the moment
edit: Linux uses
Claudecopilot ffs. It needs to be noted as an AI contribution and needs human review but Linux and Windows definitely use AI coding agents and I guarantee Apple does too. Be in denial all you want. I’m not advocating for them, I’m stating the reality of the industry right now.- 21 minutes
linux kernel code scrutiny is extreme
random vibe coded github repo code scrutiny is none at all
- Tja@programming.devEnglish2 hours
Lemmy users don’t care about reality, you’re talking to a brick wall basically.
- JabbaTheThott@lemmy.worldEnglish1 hour
Read it and weep. From April 2026 https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/linux-lays-down-the-law-on-ai-generated-code-yes-to-copilot-no-to-ai-slop-and-humans-take-the-fall-for-mistakes-after-months-of-fierce-debate-torvalds-and-maintainers-come-to-an-agreement
Again I am not advocating for AI coding agents but they ARE BEING USED in major applications. Unplug or accept a lot of software/websites you use are using coding agents
- teslekova@sh.itjust.worksEnglish4 hours
Yep, everyone updoot this so the ones who come after can stop reading at the top comment.
- 3 hours
I just want one where the storage the vac empties out into is on the side so it can slide under a couch.
These things take so much damn space and for some reason they didn’t figure out there is a bunch of real estate underneath shit.
- Vex_Detrause@lemmy.caEnglish2 hours
Delete this comment, sell idea to a company, profit! But in all seriousness this is a smart idea.
- Fmstrat@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
While this is a cool idea, if you read the article, it’s only an idea. Seems like nothing but a reference design has actually been made. Hoping to see it progress, but we shall see.
- Buddahriffic@lemmy.worldEnglish20 minutes
Yeah, over the years I’ve learned to not hold my breath about any interesting announcement. Though I’m at the point now where I don’t really care either way and feel like pointing it out for any specific project just feels overly pessimistic. Just let them cook or contribute knowing there’s never a guarantee it’ll come to fruition.
- Sam_Bass@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
the robot vac i have had for 3 years is the dumbest machine. goes over the same areas multiple times a session. has a manual steer setting but if i gotta steer it, whats the point of robotics? finally gave up and got a dust mop.
- Tja@programming.devEnglish2 hours
At the risk of sounding like an ad, roborock (xiaomi) makes fantastic vacuums. Great navigation, great cleaning performance, obstacle avoidance (cables, socks, etc) depends on the model.
They do offer a meter interface if you want to have it offline, but I’m quite happy with the (cloud based) app, allows a bit more control.
It integrates with home assistant but it sometimes goes “unavailable”, the matter integration is a bit more stable for that.
I sure other manufacturers also have great ones, check “vacuum wars” on YouTube.
- captainlezbian@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
Ooh, this might be a great project for my wife and I to build together
- captainlezbian@lemmy.worldEnglish4 hours
Oh the physical part is all me, she just wants to do the computer stuff lol. But yeah she’s been interested in some projects where she can program and I can build.
- HubertManne@piefed.socialEnglish4 hours
The two things with robot vacs is one cleaning the roller is to annoying. I think it would be best for it to be like a shop vac. Yeah it would not do as good a job but would be a good general cleaner and you don’t have to mess with the roller sweeper. Two is a base station to auto empty the refuse bin. Honestly for the first part it maybe just better as an option. so you have one for more thorugh clean that will need more maint but no more than a standard vacc and one that is less maint and can pickup more types of stuff. Might be good just to have the shop vac type go first so that the roller type gets gunked up less.
- Tja@programming.devEnglish2 hours
The roller has been solved a few years ago. The split-roller design doesn’t need any maintenance, no hair tangles in the two years I owned mine. Plenty of robots use it, as the patent expired.
- glitch1985@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
I agree completely but the suction required for something without a brush is huge and you’ll need a much bigger motor and battery. I had a vacuum that didn’t auto empty for years and while my new one is a huge upgrade it was a time saver just to have one do the vacuuming and then empty it manually or every other time if there wasn’t much dirt.
- HubertManne@piefed.socialEnglish2 hours
See I found it was not much of a time saving. I would rather just vaccum than clean and prep it. It was useful when my wife was sick as I literally needed to be able to do two things at once and cleaning it out could be done at any time and piece meal and such so it worked. But under normal circumstances, again, I would just prefer to vaccum which does not take all that much time and is not ardous. Now something that went pretty often and was like 99% autonomous where I just empty a bine once a week. That would be worth it. Even if I had to vaccum I could do it once a week and keep the carpet very clean or once a month and have it be pretty decently generally clean.
- ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish10 hours
3real5me…the amount of time and money needed to make even simple projects robust and truly usable, and not just a janky DIY job that needs to be used in just the right way or it’s wonky is always more than you expect. No matter how many times you’ve been through the process.
- Eheran@lemmy.worldEnglish9 hours
I think my device is easy and intuitive to use. The user wants video instructions and refuses to use my thing otherwise :(
- elucubra@sopuli.xyzEnglish10 hours
I tend to consider first attempts/versions as Betas. Sometimes I will do the full alpha, beta, RC cycle
Freedman has a pretty good video relating to this
- MonkderVierte@lemmy.zipEnglish10 hours
I would actually be more interested in custom firmware for our old touch-and-go Roomba. The hardware is great, fully modular, did even survive a round of cat barf and washing. But the firmware is buggy and does inefficient vacuuming rounds.
- CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.worldEnglish8 hours
I would actually be more interested in custom firmware for our old touch-and-go Roomba
The only thing out there that I know of is https://valetudo.cloud/
- MonkderVierte@lemmy.zipEnglish8 hours
Which is basically only a on-device proxy to prevent communications.
But thanks.
- Dymonika@lemmy.mlEnglish11 hours
Ha, let’s hope that doesn’t happen here. This is genuinely exciting.
- e461h@sh.itjust.worksEnglish5 hours
Awesome project. So cool DIYers can build something like this now (with a lot of help from the project owner)!
Dyskolos@lemmy.zipEnglish
7 hoursAwesome project! I would love to buy some robovacs, but I don’t want some unknown entitity mapping our home and whatnot. Our maid would love it too. Being done earlier for the same pay 😁
Dyskolos@lemmy.zipEnglish
6 hoursOh. Wow. Thanks. Last time I checked the market it was horrible and then I just gave up on robovacs. Too many different to reverse engineer every single one. But great, gonna check this one out deeply. Thanks man.
- AbKingPro@sh.itjust.worksEnglish6 hours
The setup is fairly involved and not super beginner friendly however I finally came across and finished to flash my robot a few weeks ago and i don’t notice any difference vs the stock firmware when using home assistant, beside the fact that its no longer connecting to all these random servers in China. It really is a wonderful project!
Dyskolos@lemmy.zipEnglish
3 hoursSounds great! Although I less worry about Chinese servers than american servers 😁 I would even be fine if it were shittier then, or totally manual programming or whatever. Just not clouds that get data I know nothing about and have no agency over it.
- Feathercrown@lemmy.worldEnglish14 hours
You can tell it’s a genuine high-quality open-source project because the name sucks
- Fmstrat@lemmy.worldEnglish3 hours
About the name: “oomwoo” is a rotational ambigram — it reads the same flipped 180°, just like the robot itself roaming your floor in every direction.
There was an attempt.
- Mika@piefed.caEnglish19 minutes
Now we need to invent a recursive acronym for this name and it would be perfect
Axolotl@feddit.itEnglish
5 minutes“Open OOMWOO Might Win Over Obstructions”
referring to the fact that these things often end up crashing into everything
- 13 hours
It’s called OOMWOO in all caps dude. My idea is, call it literally anything else. Also I’m getting one
- Lumisal@lemmy.worldEnglish5 hours
If that way the case, in keeping with open source tradition, it should be the Uwumba
- elucubra@sopuli.xyzEnglish10 hours
The name apparently is a rotational ambigram. I would have sworn it was a transdimensional mammogram
- jabberwock@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish12 hours
Something much better like eufy? Or roomba?
I think it’s a law that robot vacuums must be named something silly.
- unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyzEnglish13 hours
I have no objections. If it doesn’t connect to the wider internet, could be cool
- ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish10 hours
VacBot, HoovrBot AutoVac, AutoHoovr…there’s just so many options for names that describe what it is
- 13 hours
I propose renaming it to SUCKS cos that’s what vacuums do.
- 3 hours
That’s good.
I was thinking we could come up with an acronym resulting in suck
Nate@piefed.alphapuggle.devEnglish
15 hoursSick, but also in the mean time check out the Valetudo project
- buddascrayon@lemmy.worldEnglish7 hours
Looks pretty cool but a very short list of compatible devices. Also, what they consider “budget options” are not what I would consider “in my price range”. LoL 😂
- Tja@programming.devEnglish2 hours
What is your price range, a button and two shells? The S5 can be found for 50 bucks used.
- adeoxymus@lemmy.worldEnglish8 hours
I love valetudo!
But I also think there should be more open source robotics, and a robot vacuum feels the right topic as a starting point.
I think I also saw someone that wanted to make a robot grass cutter.
TDCN@feddit.dkEnglish
13 hoursAs i understand it Valetudo is not actually firmware to control the robot. It is a “parasite” that makes the existing robot firmware belive it is connected to the cloud which is very different from actually controlling and navigating the robot. However, in terms of homeasistant integration it could be worth getting inspired.
For a control operating system ROS could be something to consider. When I used it 10 years ago the project was quite unstable since tools changed constantly and it was overly complicated to work with, but a lot of development has happened since so maybe worth considering.I wrote this before reading the article- 13 hours
This is why I love foss software. Their is some guy hacking away at some very specific problem in his own time and he shares it with the world for free. You will have never heard of this problem or even contemplated its existence but once u know some foss developer has solved it going back to a world where it doesn’t exist is just a little bit duller.
- 10 hours
If I have an old Roomba can I hack a new brain into it? I’ve got a Raspberry Pi and a soldering iron and a willingness to break them for science. Never done much hardware hacking though.



















