Swedish VPN vendor Mullvad is facing a backlash from some customers after co-founder Daniel Berntsson personally donated SEK 5 million (£385,000, $519,000) to the controversial populist Örebropartiet, which is running in Sweden’s national elections for the first time.

Berntsson has this week published a blog post explaining the donation, alongside posts titled “Immigration,” “Political individualism,” and “Moral individualism.” Before that, he had not posted since 2019.

The flurry of posts follows weeks of customer criticism over the donation – for example, Finnish blog Moonwriting’s post “I’m done with Mullvad.” Another blog, Unutterable, is more direct: “Mullvad funding the far-right and the problem with tech company ownership.” The Hacker News discussion thread about the donations has reached a remarkable 1,784 comments so far.

Mullvad was co-founded and is still jointly owned and run by two CEOs, Berntsson and Fredrik Strömberg. Its name, as reflected in the company’s logo, is Swedish for “mole.” It also offers the Mullvad Browser, a privacy-enhanced fork of Firefox ESR co-developed with the Tor Project. Swedish socialist newspaper Flamman (“The Flame”) revealed the donation in its story “High-profile techie gives millions to the Örebro Party.”

In a post on X, the company said it was devoted to freedom of speech and tolerance, saying: “It should be obvious that Daniel’s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad’s values or mission, in the same way that someone’s opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn’t.”

  • 55 minutes

    Since there are always people who, purposely or not, misrepresent what’s going on here and I’ve hashed it out in other threads I’ll paste it here as well as some links to share alternatives. Like, how do I see upvotes on a comment saying it’s a marxist far left party? The National Socialists also promised homes and dental and everything good for the Aryan race once they ethnically cleansed the rest. They certainly weren’t any kind of left wing.

    Sorry for the wall of text, copying and pasting from some of my other comments, I’ll bold the main points to create the throughline:

    What, by definition, constitutes fascism?

    Merriam Webster

    often Fascism : a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition

    At the core of fascism is loyalty to tribe, ethnic identity, religion, tradition, or, in a word, nation. —Jason Stanley

    Just to make sure we’re not looking at a singular definition, let’s look at Wikipedia too

    Fascism (/ˈfæʃɪzəm/ FASH-iz-əm) is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe.[1][2][3] Fascism is characterized by support for a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.[3][4] Opposed to communism, democracy, liberalism, pluralism, and socialism,[5][6] fascism is at the far-right of the traditional left–right spectrum.[1][6][7]

    And now, let’s look at what the Örebro party’s own stated platform, which received 72% of its funding from the Mullvad founder, which also amounted to 27 times their total funding in 2024, and has directly led to them stating that with this funding they can field candidates whereby they couldn’t previously:

    Some of its key issues include strong secularism, a 30-hour workweek with retained pay, lowered wages for politicians, ending taxes on energy and fuel, ending taxpayer funding of what it sees as wasteful sculptures, monuments and art, large-scale remigration, expanded social housing, a stricter assimilation policy, and free dental care.[3][4]

    https://www.friatider.se/markus-allard-om-andra-generationens-invandrare-de-ska-ocksa-ut

    Örebro Party leader Markus Allard goes to the election on expulsions. He opens to withdraw citizenship and also expel second generation of immigrants – even if they were born in Sweden. “I’m prepared to cross corpses,” he said.

    One suggestion that he has is that citizenship and permanent residence permits can be torn up – with reference to “Sweden is the country of Swedes”.

    In a section of Yoshi’s Podcast, Allard develops his view on expulsions and explains that he prepared to “go over corpses” to bring home unwanted immigrants. The host notes that there will be no beautiful sight when, for example, immigrant mothers who have been on maternity leave for 15 years are to be deported together with their children. “It’s not going to be pretty to send these people home,” he said. Markus Allard agrees, but says: I think you can handle that optics. Even the children will need to be deported, he explains.

    He further explains that many of the problems relate to second-generation immigrants. They are going out too. Even if they were born in Sweden, because they have no natural connection to Sweden. They are not Swedes. They have not become Swedes. It says Sweden in the passport, but they have not been interested in becoming part of Sweden. There’s a difference. It’s a qualitative difference," Allard said

    And what’s remigration?

    Remigration is a far-right concept referring to the ethnic cleansing[1] via mass deportation of non-white minority populations, especially immigrants and sometimes including native-born citizens, to their place of racial ancestry.[2][3]

    So fascism is about racial and national purity and hierarchy, as we defined, and the Orebro party supports remigration, which is a concept of forcing immigrants out of countries to preserve the purity of “culture” and the race of the nation.

    “Sweden is for the Swedes”

    “Israel is for Israelis”

    “America is for Americans”

    “Germany is for the Germans”

    For those looking for other vpn options:

    https://vpn.techlore.tech/

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/u/0/d/1ijfqfLrJWLUVBfJZ_YalVpstWsjw-JGzkvMd6u2jqEk/htmlview#gid=231869418

  • It should be obvious that [founder’s] private donation to a political party is not part of [his company’s] values or mission

    Riiiiiiiiiight, because it always shakes out like that

  • 2 hours

    There’s no equally good VPN company, by a wide margin.

    This guy’s a rich “libertarian anarchist” who donated to the new party of a marxist he followed because he wants lower taxes and less immigration.

    I don’t really even know what to make of that. Unlike the Proton guy who slobbered on the demented rapist’s bunghole, which I knew exactly what to make of it.

    • 20 minutes

      He’s a fascist painted with a faded red star, but even the Nazi flag used a bit of red. For the well informed, it’s actually a classic.

  • I have already quit my subscription. Haven’t taken the time to find an alternative yet. I’m stocked up on media for the time being.

    • 2 hours

      At this point it’s safer to just assume every purchase you make is funding far right politics.

    • 4 hours

      Yes, although frankly it’s really fucking hard to name anything that isn’t these days. Like, you probably can’t even go grocery shopping without some of that money finding us way to alt right politics.

            • Well it doesn’t start with FTX because they didn’t offer a VPN service. Can you name just one then please?

                • Yeah it’s weird how these generalizations fall apart when you try to find a single example of a far-left VPN provider but all you can come up with is a years-defunct criminal crypto hedge fund whose “far-left funding” was donating to a middle-right democrat’s election fund.

            • what an incredibly low effort troll. Mamdani might be the only center-left politician in the US. There are no far-left politicians in the US empire.

        • 6 hours

          I’ve heard that one as well from graphene devs on mastodon and I agree that this is not you typical right wing populist. Don’t know if calling him left wing is any more appropriate though

    • This is a frustrating pposition to be in, particularly when few people are willing to offer viable alternatives in such threads.

      I don’t want to let a purity test be the reason I impulse switch to a less effective VPN, but don’t want to indirectly fund things I don’t support. Yes, money I spend on Mullvad might go towards shit I don’t want, but what else is on par with Mullvad that doesn’t have some other downside?

      • 55 minutes

        I don’t think the world has ever been black and white. Whatever you purchase is based on someone’s suffering or funds it in some way or another. The best we can do is be less evil. If you think you can still do good by using mullvad’s service, you should stay. If you think switching will be more beneficial for you—even at the cost of productivity and perhaps a difference in price—then you should ditch Mullvad.

      • 59 minutes

        but don’t want to indirectly fund things I don’t support.

        The only safe way to do that is to not spend at all. Unless you find a co-op, your money is going to some owner(s) who will use the money as they please. Commercial VPNs are mostly privacy snake oil and ways to get access to media, so abstaining for a while isn’t unreasonable.

      • 4 hours

        Afaik IVPN is really the only alternative. I’ll be switching to them soon when my account expires.

    • 3 hours

      It seems so, and also who knows what else, maybe even the far left

    • No, no, its just the ceo’s personal politics that he donates lots of money get fwrs from his job to.

  • 5 hours

    I made the switch to IPVN and it’s felt exactly the same. Maybe even better. Same price. Servers in multiple locations. Allows routing through 2 VPN servers. No logs. No money going to racist ideology.

    Mullvad can claim whatever they like about their values, but they are a for-profit company. The profits of the company are being used to fund racial segregation. If they believe in their values they’ll switch to a non-profit foundation. Until that time they can get fucked!

      • 3 hours

        Nope they’re owned by a single person. I hope he’ll be more responsible. If you know of any non-profit vpn providers let me know! Happy to switch again

        • 1 hour

          I had hoped you had any examples since you pointed out that it’s a for-profit company :/ Can’t do IPVN either than since who knows what the owner uses their money for.

          • 20 minutes

            All I know is the profits of Mullvad go to bad causes. Yes IVPN aren’t perfect but the services are so similar the choice should be obvious. Until a better alternative comes along i’m going to use the one that does less harm.

    • 4 hours

      I’m curious if they offer port forwarding? That feature has been keeping me on PIA despite ethical concerns

      • AirVPN does port forwarding, and they’re less dodgy than PIA. Proton also does but there’s some questions raised by the CEOs support of Trump (still less dodgy than PIA though)

      • 3 hours

        Damn that’s the only thing they don’t offer compared to the others 💔

  • “It should be obvious that Daniel’s private donation to a political party is not part of Mullvad’s values or mission, in the same way that someone’s opinions on animal rights, taxes or public healthcare policy isn’t.”

    I’m not sure what they mean by this. Plenty of corporations do make animal rights, taxes, public healthcare, etc. an important part of their values and mission. Why would it be obvious that they’re not?

    Besides, we do want Nazis and fascists to be pariahs. Putting pressure on Mullvad not to associate is a good thing.

    • 5 hours

      Specially in Nordics. Social corporate responsibility is a very long tradition in Nordics, specially with due to stuff like co-operative customer, producer or worker owned companies, state enterprises and so on.

      Including leadership teams behavior. Companies do get flack for what kind of persons they hire as leadership, since it is (pretty reasonably) assumed their mindset and worldview affects their conduct while leading the company.

      Plus not only is he leader, he is owner so again money to company’s pocket is in the end money to his pocket.

      One can’t claim “we are responsible company, while having opposite kind of CEO/leader”. It is his private matter he has these opinions, what isn’t private is him being company leader. Company doesn’t want his private opinions affecting the company, get rid of him as leader.

      It would be one thing, if he was “lineworker” employee. Then person can have private opinions don’t affect company. However he isn’t mere salary employee in the depths of server hall lifting and plugging in servers to racks and cleaning cooling equipment clean. He is company leadership.

      • I agree (though I still think it is a good thing to fire fascists, even when they are lowly employees lol)

    • The guy made a donation with his own money. His donation is no more Mullvads than a donation you make privately is representative of the company you work for.

      • 6 hours

        The guy made a donation with his own money

        Uhh where do you think that money comes from?

        If you’ve bought Mullvad’s services you have unwittingly contributed to that donation.

        • 3 hours

          Every nazis salary comes from somewhere, or do you boycott just about everything?

          • 3 hours

            do you boycott just about everything?

            It’s just not buying stuff. You make it sound impossible.

            • 1 hour

              No I mean, every nazis or racist gets their money from somewhere, be it Mullvad or Nestlé or Walmart, how do you avoid supporting that? Do you just don’t buy stuff from anywhere or do you have an ever shrinking base of viable options?

              • 28 minutes

                Well take this guy for example - I dont know how he invests but I know a significant portion of his income will be coming from Mullvad. So yeah, I can’t personally choke all of his income, but I can boycott a wee bit of it. I will do that, because I think its the right thing to do.

        • Yes I fully understand how he gets money from being part owner of the company, I never said that wasn’t the casr. But how he chooses to spend his private cash is not the fault of Mullvad the company.

          I completely get wanting to boycott the company to avoid giving him money. But it makes no sense to blame the company for his private spending.

          • I don’t care who’s fault it is, I’d still rather use a VPN that didn’t have any controversy.

          • 5 hours

            It’s absolutely people’s business whether they support the public face of a public company giving money to a public political party

            • Like, what part of Mullvad not being responsible for the donation in any way is it that people are not understanding? The company had no control or say over this dudes donation, so they can’t be responsible for it. Sure, don’t buy mullvad so you avoid indirectly giving the nutjob more money to support his fascist political views, that’s a totally valid response. But It doesn’t change that Mullvad is not, and never can be, responsible for his donation.

      • 6 hours

        Not sure how involved he is but I guess as a co-founder he is bound to be getting some of the Mullvad money

        • Yes of course he is. but once it leaves the company to pay him his share, Mullvad is not able to control of what that money is spent on whatsoever. Since he made a private decision outside the control or influence of the company, how couod Mullvad be accountable for it?

          • 5 hours

            We get that the people who work for a jerk, are not responsible for the bad decisions of that jerk, and it’s a shame that they will suffer for his bad decisions, but that’s part of the risks you take as an employee, and there are a great many risks you take working for anyone, most of which the owner class refuse to acknowledge. We all recognize that it’s a struggle to find new employment, but they always have the option of finding a new company to work for.

            The owner is the primary beneficiary of any capital investment. Collateral damage for their decisions is their responsibility, not the consumer.

          • 6 hours

            I agree… although I also understand people who feel the other way. As a top guy in the company the money he gets is going to be usually much more than an employee and for just existing at the top. So it feels more like company money than someone getting paid for actually putting in the grunt work to keep the company running. Not to mention that nobody is talking about mullvad and the ideology of random coder #26, the actions of the cofounder is always going to be in the same sentence as mullvad. So I understand taking a stance to not feed into that.

            However I don’t agree with the moral superiority stance that often (not always) comes with that viewpoint. By all means boycott them yourself but I’m not one to push that on others unless it is actually the company itself donating or if their views start poisoning the quality of the service they provide (brave for example)

  • If they are rich they are almost always a right wing asshole. Why would anyone be surprised by this?

    • 2 hours

      Per his blog he’s a “libertarian anarchist”.

      ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • ->libertarian.

        I always read that as ‘far right, but kinda ashamed, or can’t get laid by claiming it so….’

        • 51 minutes

          It means “I want to do bad things without consequences” just like free speech absolutist means “I want to say bad things and no one is allowed to call me names”.

      • I always say there should be a hard cutoff at a million a year and you should be taxed 100% at anything over that.

        • I think it would be more effective to have a hard wealth (both liquid and non-liquid assets) cutoff of somewhere between $10-50 million rather than a cap on an annual income.

        • 3 hours

          Even from a capitalist perspective this makes sense. Money pooling at the top is money not moving through the economy; 100% taxes encourage reinvestment and philanthropy to avoid the tax.

          • 5 minutes

            I’m not educated here - how is the money not moving through the economy? Billionaires and trillionaires surely keep their money in a bank / investment accounts right?

      • The point of wealth is heyying around limits. You cannot continue to have fungible personal wealth without corruption. It doesn’t even work on a hypothetical philosophical level.

    • Yeah, literally 99.999% of products you buy in 2026 fund right wing fascism, and most of it you can’t escape because they own the entire supply chain.

      Ain’t capitalism fun?

    • Could you explain why? I’ve been looking at switching to iVPN but I haven’t discovered enough to make me feel comfortable.

      • 5 hours

        I can vouch for IVPN. Made the switch when I heard the news and its been pretty seamless. Generated an account number and funded it with monero. There’s an fdroid app too! Service has been really good so far

  • 5 hours

    I found OVPN to be basically the same thing. They’ve actually proven in court that they have no way of logging customer activity.

  • 6 hours

    The Örebro Party leader is a communist. So not quite far right. And they don’t even have a party program right now. They are still working on it for the 2026 election.

    • 5 hours

      that’s what i thought, then i read what they actually want from an interview allard did in 2022. he’s basically invented a new class he calls the “transferiat”, which he claims is the main leech on society. the members of this class? public servants, journalists, and people on social security (allard even specifies “immigrants” there). he wants to get rid of this class, in order to achieve smaller government, “higher quality” reporting, and fewer welfare queens.

      that’s a textbook right-conservative agenda.

    • 6 hours

      yes, karl marx famously wrote about the deportation of migrants in his book “mein kampf”

        • 1 hour

          Allard har sedan bildandet av partiet allt mer tagit avstånd från den svenska vänstern, då han menar att den avlägsnat sig från arbetarrörelsens ursprungliga ideal. Han har istället beskrivit sin ideologiska hemvist som populism och nationalism på marxistisk grund, vilket han menar inte går att placera in på den moderna vänster–höger-skalan.

          Mellan 2022 och 2025 medverkade Allard på den av Sverigedemokraterna grundade mediekanalen Riks. Det första avsnittet av programmet med namnet “Allard” hade premiär 5 november 2022. Fokus var att diskutera dagsaktuella samhällsfrågor och intervjuer med andra samhällsdebattörer.

          He himself claims that you can’t really place their politics on the scale, because he picks ideas from both sides. Yeah, their politics are messy, but they have very fascist and white-supremacist overtones, and they gladly work with nazis. So I don’t personally care for trivial bickering about definitions here.

          Dude basically read Ayn Rand and thought “whoa yeah, that’s the shit”, when in actuality it’s just shit.

          Honestly, it’s like when right-wingers want everything privatised and scream that taxation is theft, but they’re totally happy with having taxes pay for their stuff. Just because they like to benefit from socialist policies doesn’t mean that they’re socialists.

        • 5 hours

          yeah and the nazis named themselves national socialists so i dont see your point

          • 5 hours

            Why do you even bother when you don’t know anything about the party? The leader was kicked out of the youth part of the most leftist party in the parliament in 2014. And he was kicked out for being too extreme left (he had supported the Revolutionary Front). And he started a pod with a guy who had also been kicked out for the same reason.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolutionary_Front_(Sweden)

            • 2 hours

              What’s your argument here exactly? That having once held left wing views means all future positions can’t possibly be right wing despite all evidence to the contrary?

            • 5 hours

              Well. Its well known they have some left options and a lot of far right opinions. Doesn’t matter if he once identified as a extreme leftist. He is now supporting way more far right opinions. It’s just facts. Do as you want with the facts.

            • 5 hours

              political beliefs of people aren’t static. it’s been 12 years

    • And users have the choice to not fund his ability to do so in the future by finding a different place to spend their money.

      Vote with your wallet is something not everyone believes in anymore, but at the same time, this doesn’t really have anything to do with the company’s values. It’s a simple equation. Giving the company money means this guy receives money. So people want to stop giving him money by proxy.

    • 6 hours

      And everybody else has the freedom to not support him or his business. So, a win win for freedom then.

    • Customers also have the freedom to divest from his product as a direct consequence of his political activism, which many are doing.

      • On top of that, the far-left doesn’t exist. All who protest against capitalism and the fascist elite, all those that support social liberation, are comrades and allies of liberty.

        • 43 minutes

          Tankies exist, they just aren’t dangerous because they have no power right now. That and their intellectual bancruptcy. Authoritarianism is a disease. The fascists just happen to be both sick and in control.

        • 46 minutes

          That’s not true, I am the far left. I am so much lefter than all of you! 😎

    • Is that guy funding the far-left in the room with you right now? He seems to play an important roll for you.

      • How is the Mullvad guy far right? I thought the Örebro Party was a Marxist party focused on expanding socialized services, like expanding healthcare, reducing costs for public transport, shortening the work week while keeping full pay, etc.

        • 41 minutes

          focused on expanding socialized services, like expanding healthcare, reducing costs for public transport, shortening the work week while keeping full pay,

          For whom exactly? That’s your answer. The OG Nazis said that kind of thing too.

          • 23 minutes

            The Nazis were bad because they did the holocaust and tried to conquer Europe, not because they expanded the safety net and gave their citizens healthcare.

            I’m just asking how they’re considered right wing.

        • 4 hours

          They are a confusing mix or far left and far right ideas and are a person cult around Allard that came from the left but has bridged the horse shoe and gone xenophobic totalitarian nationalist.

          • 40 minutes

            Its not far left to want nice things for your favoured in-group. That’s right.

          • Like, he has his own bodyguards or security agency?

            (My understanding is it’s a local political party that operates in one town.)

            • 57 minutes

              Like, he has his own bodyguards or security agency?

              Very few politicians here have that. No idea if he does, but it doesn’t seem likely.

              They are a local political party operating out of the town Örebro, they have some regional seats in the region that’s also called Örebro.

              Local and regional politics is still important though. Having fascists diddle around with that is bad news.