• surph_ninja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I guarantee the results would be the opposite of what you expect. The disinformation maintains the consensus. The voices speaking against the norm are the ones being drowned out by the bots and astroturfers.

  • Test_Tickles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    When Russia invaded the Ukraine, and sanctions were initially placed against them and the internet to Russia was cut… Reddit was its old self for about 2 weeks. There were still some random nut bags wondering around saying crazy and hateful shit, but the level of misinformation and everything else dropped by at least 90%. It was pretty eye-opening.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I would be delighted. I feel the same way about advertising - just show me the product and describe its features, don’t do a song and dance or put on a little play about it.

  • ElPussyKangaroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It depends on how you classify misinformation/ disinformation… Scientific disinformation could just be stuff that has been disproven…

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Science has an unintuitive philosophical system, it is actually impossible (or just not feasible) to “disprove” a lot of things absolutely 100%.

        Best you can do is prove something, or fail to prove something.

        And it does make some sense, there’s uncertainty in measurements, there’s some probability and statistics involved.

        Proving there are NOT aliens out there would require checking every inch of every planet for life, remains, or fossils.