The group responsible is “Collective Shout”, the same org has targeted Steam before.

There are calls on social media now to contact Mastercard, Visa and co. and file complaints.

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 months ago

    Meanwhile, on my feed there’s a post directly below this one about a compiler that will give you BSDM messages for good and bad coding and can even be hooked up to a remote butt plug to pleasure you when you compile a successful program.

  • madjo@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Puritanical US based payment processors need to stop getting their panties twisted.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I don’t even understand how they give a shit. Seems like the perfect place for shareholders to want them to make as much money as possible, it’s a limited market.

      • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        People with a lot of money doesn’t really want just money. They want power to impose their views over the rest. Money is just a mean to do so.

        • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          the payment processors didn’t randomly wake up this week and decide to ban NSFW video games on a power trip.

          they are being financially pressured in some way to threaten game platforms that they’ll remove their services completely. the implication of that is they’re worried about losing even more money than they make from payments on game platforms.

          from the payment processors perspective, they’re thinking, “okay this is not a hill we want to die on and it’s a small percentage of our business anyway.”

  • yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Can we force law banning money transactions to the churches and christian organisations?

    Fight fire with fire (not literally, at least not yet, even if they did that long time ago already).

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    First they came for the incest/rape games, which most people somewhat agree with (although the principle is still wrong) Next up is all nsfw games. After that, it’ll be mainstream and indie games altogether. This never stops with just one “victory” for these groups.

    • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      There are specific games in steam’s case I’m very ok with getting removed, but at the same time its very fucked up that we’re in a situation where the world is beholden to payment processors. Ideally this would be a case where they go directly to Valve and say “hey we think you should take a look at your content policy and at these specific games” and Valve makes the call from there on where they want to draw the line.

      • Sandwich Artist@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Im curious what games and type of content they contain you think should be removed from steam. Ive seen a few cartoon pornish type of things pop up before but didnt appear outwardly outlandish. Having never intentionally sought out this content Im curious is there a dark depraved section of the steam store Ive never seen before?

        • Cyv_@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The main stuff I saw removed was related to incest and rape, not in a “it contains it” way. Somehow Corruption of Champions 2 escaped the ban hammer which makes me think those games probably took things pretty far, or were basically built to simulate assaulting people.

          For reference, CoC2 is uh… Well when you lose in combat the enemy fucks you, and vice versa. It’s like a lot of fetish stuff too. So not that I know exactly what’s in the games, but I feel like you have to really be trying to outdo CoC2.

          Edit: I’m not criticizing CoC2 btw, it’s fine. Its… I don’t wanna say tasteful but non con is like one of 90 things you can or cannot opt into. Idk how to put it. It’s an actual game that happens to have non con content I guess is what I mean.

    • Broadfern@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s going to come down to anything with even a whisper of LGBTQ+/minority/disability/etc representation, just like with books.

      They start with the “egregious” content (not that it’s necessarily right to remove that either), then narrow it down until it shapes up into hegemonic conformity and systemic oppression via media (there’s a term for it, kind of like stochastic violence but not quite that I can’t remember atm).

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Yes, but.

      Everyone should read the open letter that’s linked in the itch statement, to have a fully informed opinion.

      There definitely is a line. Everyone can choose were they draw it. You don’t have to draw it in a way where you end up defending things that are kinda messed up.

      There is definitely a hill worth fighting on in that area. I don’t think it’s this exact one.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        My line is these payment processors being judge, jury and executioner about what material they deem valid. So I am fundamentally opposed.

      • hornyAltAccount@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I feel like there is nuance that is really getting lost on some people and that is the way that people engage with these games. Let me try to explain: I like playing NSFW games - even with tags like Rape, Corruption or the occasional Incest. Without trying to go into too much detail, it’s simply erotic to me in the correct context.

        Now, do I know that these topics are incredibly taboo and/or offensive in real life? Yes, of course. I keep these things private and never put them out in real life. I would rather noone knows about what I do privately in my own time at my own PC. The way I see it, I simply paid an artist to draw something erotic and write a good story and/or program some gameplay attached to it. And once I stop engaging with the videogame, I also do not have any desire to recreate anything in real life. The same way that I don’t go around killing people after playing GTA, I also don’t go around assaulting women because I played a videogame where these things happen.

        And that’s exactly what worries me - the people pushing this narrative, genuinely think I would want to start reenacting something I’ve seen in a videogame happen. That is complete nonsense.

  • qyron@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Let the Digital Euro become a thing. It will wreck havoc on the current payment ecosystem.

    And the Digital Euro is not a crypto. It will be a digital currency, backed by the ECB, at a one to one exchange rate with standard euro currency.

      • network_switch@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        The various groups trying to ban payments for NSFW products and whatever else they don’t like would just target the ECB and member states to restrict transactions they don’t like

        • Jackhammer_Joe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Sure. Targeting a central bank and several independent nations will be as simple as pressuring two US companies. /s

          • network_switch@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You’re a dick. Hope you get better

            Practically the whole world has been having an authoritarian/conservative shift. I would not expect the EU and ECB to be a progressive force for sex work. The EU has been pushing to break encryption for a solid decade now. Visa and Mastercard process 90% of transactions outside of China. They’re huge. I don’t see why ECB leadership would be particularly less conservative and risk averse than Visa and Mastercard. Bankers are usually on the conservative side of politics

            • qyron@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              The Nederlands, Germany, Spain, if I’m not wrong, France and Italy have prostitution as legal. My own country abstains from legislating on it, instead opting to criminalizing procuring and the facilitation of prostitution, as well as human traffic for such end.

              Europe has a well established culture of sex work, with a good number of organizations lobbying - openly, through open public debate - in the way of making sex workers being recognized as any other worker and increasing their social relevance and recognition.

              If you inform yourself a bit, in my country, you can legally establish yourself as an escort, under a very specific tax code, and pay taxes according to the money you make and have tax deductions and social benefits.

              Currently, we already have a direct payment and transfer system, called MBWay, that through your phone number, allows for transfering, paying and collecting money, from one account to another.

              No fintech, no middle agents, no shit: direct transfers from one account to another.

              The Digital Euro takes this a step further. And even if the eEuro never takes place, this system is to be widened to all EU and abroad, to run against AliPay, Visa, MasterCard and others.

              Bankers want money.

              American bankers should spit out the “holy” book they have stuck up their arses.

              • network_switch@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                At least Germany, Spain, and Italy have resurgent far right political movements. I am not about to trust government payment systems to not eventually be abused as technology makes control and surveillance easier. A holy book can be replaced with whatever new age self-help, health movement, anti-<ethnicity/sexuality/religion> movement. All it takes is some instability and desperation and people will support whatever or turn a blind eye to whatever they may think is not their problem or they may potentially benefit from. Good for the EU to run their own payment systems. When a conservative wave takes a large enough majority in governance someday, it’ll be the same problem as Visa/Mastercard/etc

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    A reminder that some absolutely brain-forsaken hateful morons actually voted for Trump because they thought he would take the side against these kind of puritanicals. You know, by removing black and disabled people from workplaces and stuff, and by letting Musk raid the IRS. Logic is not their strong suit.

  • hmmm@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I hate American Companies it will be a good time to start a new platform for NSFW games and payment platforms

    • seralth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Good fucking luck with that.

      The problem is platform agnostic. You basically can’t have digital payments with out visa,MasterCard,PayPal. Even other payment processors are mostly beholden to them cause they are using parts of their networks.

      And trying to go only crypto to by pass this problem will just result in the death of a platform. Crypto is still decades away from being viable for anything out side of large purchases or investments.

      The payment processing side of crypto is extremely weak to do something like this.

  • Gibibit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s nice to see a more reasonable response in the comments on Fediverse. On the itch discussion board people are frothing at the mouth posting death threats and the like against itch staff.

    The anger is completely misdirected. I wouldn’t be surprised if they decide to just let itch drop dead after this abuse from two sides simultaneously. Mega corps and rights groups at one side, and their very own users on the other.

    Once this review is complete, we will introduce new compliance measures. For NSFW pages, this will include a new step where creators must confirm that their content is allowable under the policies of the respective payment processors linked to their account.

    Itch is even willing to go for partial filtering, what more do you want. The only thing that will please these people is when itch waves their magic wand and keeps everything as is. Like folks here have said, accepting crypto payments might help, but who knows how soon that is going to get regulated.

    • hisao@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Like folks here have said, accepting crypto payments might help, but who knows how soon that is going to get regulated.

      It’s kinda impossible to regulate technically. That’s the whole point of crypto. Or do you mean that the company itself might be legally prohibited to accept crypto by their local law? That’s possible I think. I guess we’re slowly but steadily approaching the demand to have actual darknet fully-crypto gaming platform operated by anonymous team.

      • seralth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Crypto has serious weaknesses on the payment processing side of things when it comes to small to medium business purposes.

        Not to mention your still beholden to the traditional payment processors the moment you want to get your money out of crypto and back into an actual usable form.

        Crypto is great. As long as you stay within its ecosystem the moment you need to sit on the line where you’re transferring in and out real money to crypto crypto to real money on a small scale with frequent processes. You just end up right back where you started.

        Visa, MasterCard, PayPal and many others have already made sure to have methods to put pressure on that middle link between crypto and real money. So even if you try and sidestep them, don’t worry. They’ve thought of it too.

        • hisao@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Crypto is great. As long as you stay within its ecosystem

          Making crypto backed by more and more things (like games) makes staying within its ecosystem more comfortable in the long run.

          Not to mention your still beholden to the traditional payment processors the moment you want to get your money out of crypto and back into an actual usable form.

          the moment you need to sit on the line where you’re transferring in and out real money to crypto crypto to real money on a small scale with frequent processes. You just end up right back where you started.

          Yeah, but there are already tons of widely-known legal services everybody uses like Coinbase, Binance, etc, which make it easy to P2P from card to crypto and it’s impossible to control money flows after it turns into crypto, which means controlling how people spend their money like this would be impossible. But yeah, regarding big players like Steam adopting crypto and converting into/from real money on large scale - and what payment processors can do about this if they are pissed off - this is something I have no idea about. But people like Elon Musk probably do this a lot with incredible volumes of money.

    • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Once this review is complete, we will introduce new compliance measures. For NSFW pages, this will include a new step where creators must confirm that their content is allowable under the policies of the respective payment processors linked to their account.

      kind of a clever way to say “hey don’t give us grief, if you want to change this go complain to visa and mastercard.”

  • shads@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Posted this elsewhere so just going to copy paste here but with regards to Collective Shout:

    I think we need to get this group to weigh in on the content of certain holy books. Surely as a secular organisation they will have no problem demanding that the bible and qur’an be banned (I bet I know which one they actually would like banned).

    After all we don’t want kids exposed to books that contain incest, sex, violence, rape, etc. I’m sure there are some parts of Ezekiel they will want editted at the absolute minimum.

    I imagine balkanisation would be one way to make them slightly less visible/insufferable, and you know they would love some factional infighting.

    Every time they get brought up they should be forced to confront that the people pulling their strings are most likely engaging in all the things they want banned from culture (regardless of culture or intent). Once they are forced to start lobbying Visa and MasterCard to block transactions to religious bodies I will accept they genuinely believe in the drivel they leak. Until then its performative puritanism.

    P.s. not a fan of religion of any stripe, but I would feel as violently opposed to censoring them as I am to censoring anything else, I will accept it if its the only responsible solution until then alternative can be found.

  • Cyberflunk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago
    Collective shout finacials
    year: 2024
    revenue: 458043
    employee_expenses: 107000
    other_expenses: 215488
    net_surplus: 135555
    employees: 
      total_fte: 2
      full_time: 0
      part_time: 1
      casual: 4
    volunteers: 15
    donations_and_bequests: 389800
    government_grants: 0
    commercial_income: 0
    expense_to_revenue_ratio: "70.4%"
    average_expense_per_employee: 39400
    
    Leadership
    - name: Melinda Tankard Reist
      role: Founder, Movement Director
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @MelTankardReist
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Caitlin Roper
      role: Campaigns Manager
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Renee Chopping
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - LinkedIn
      public_email_address: r******@collectiveshout.org
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Lyn Swanson Kennedy
      role: Campaigns Strategy
      public_socials:
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
    - name: Coralie Alison
      role: Movement Operations Manager
      public_socials:
        - Twitter: @CoralieAlison
        - Instagram: @collective.shout
      public_email_address: Not publicly listed
      salary: Not publicly listed
    
  • kureta@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There should be laws forcing payment processors to be neutral. They should have to accept any transaction that would be legal if made using cash.

    • Kevnyon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Considering how long payment processing as a business has been a thing, I’m amazed its not more regulated in terms of being forced to be neutral or being unable to decline processing payments that are related to completely legal transactions.

  • IzzyScissor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be clear - “Collective Shout” both is and isn’t responsible. It’s the payment processors who actually enacted policies and are using them as the scapegoat for negative feedback.

    How many times have people reported Twitter after Elon Musk took over for showing Nazi propaganda alongside their ads - with no response. An ‘open letter’ in July about a game already banned in April? DELIST EVERYTHING IMMEDIATELY.

  • tomi000@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    How the fuck did we get to the point where a company which literally only takes your money and gives it to someone else (and also gets paid for that) can decide what kind of content people consume?